2000
DOI: 10.1021/ie990526w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply Chain Optimization in Continuous Flexible Process Networks

Abstract: A multiperiod optimization model is proposed for addressing the supply chain optimization in continuous flexible process networks. The main feature of this study is that detailed operational decisions are considered over a short time horizon ranging from 1 week to 1 month. For given flexible process networks where dedicated and flexible processes coexist, we take into account the supply chain for sales, intermittent deliveries, production shortfalls, delivery delays, inventory profiles, and job changeovers. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Special cuts are added to the master problem to accelerate the convergence. Similar bi-level decomposition schemes have been developed by Bok et al (2000) for supply chain optimization problem, and by Erdirik-Dogan and for the simultaneous planning and scheduling of single-stage continuous multiproduct plants. Finally, another major decomposition approach relies on a rolling horizon strategy in which multiperiod problems are solved by recursively applying a more detailed model in the first time period and a simpler aggregate problem in the remaining time periods (Bassett et al, 1996;Dimitriadis et al, 1997).…”
Section: Decomposition Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special cuts are added to the master problem to accelerate the convergence. Similar bi-level decomposition schemes have been developed by Bok et al (2000) for supply chain optimization problem, and by Erdirik-Dogan and for the simultaneous planning and scheduling of single-stage continuous multiproduct plants. Finally, another major decomposition approach relies on a rolling horizon strategy in which multiperiod problems are solved by recursively applying a more detailed model in the first time period and a simpler aggregate problem in the remaining time periods (Bassett et al, 1996;Dimitriadis et al, 1997).…”
Section: Decomposition Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28][29] If the supply chain planning problem includes both strategic and operational decisions, bilevel decomposition 21 can be implemented to iteratively solve an upper level aggregated model and a lower level detailed model. [30][31][32] Hierarchical decomposition 22 is effective for supply chain optimizatoin problems with multiple levels of decision-making. [33][34][35][36] .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the nonlinear nonconvex terms in this model appear in constraints (30), (36) - (38) and (44). In this section, we perform exact linearizations to reformulate the MINLP model into an MILP by introducing additional variables and constraints.…”
Section: Milp Reformulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that constraints (30) and (36) - (38) are nonlinear constraints with nonconvex terms, but they can all be exactly linearized as discussed in Section 5.6.…”
Section: Figure 3 Inventory Profile Of a Customer Under Cyclic Invenmentioning
confidence: 99%