1997
DOI: 10.1109/16.622613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of oxidation-enhanced boron diffusion in silicon by carbon implantation and characterization of MOSFETs with carbon-implanted channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the principal technologies for scalling down the CMOSFET is ultra-shallow junction (USJ), which requires formation of very shallow, abrupt dopant profiles with high activation. Recently, it was found that co-implantation of carbon (C) in a range comparable with boron (B) concentrations could suppress B diffusion, resulting in a box-like B profile shape [1][2][3][4] . On the other hand, the reducing of B activation in the presence of C has been reported [2,4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the principal technologies for scalling down the CMOSFET is ultra-shallow junction (USJ), which requires formation of very shallow, abrupt dopant profiles with high activation. Recently, it was found that co-implantation of carbon (C) in a range comparable with boron (B) concentrations could suppress B diffusion, resulting in a box-like B profile shape [1][2][3][4] . On the other hand, the reducing of B activation in the presence of C has been reported [2,4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it was found that co-implantation of carbon (C) in a range comparable with boron (B) concentrations could suppress B diffusion, resulting in a box-like B profile shape [1][2][3][4] . On the other hand, the reducing of B activation in the presence of C has been reported [2,4] . Those phenomena were attributable to the formation of C-interstitial clusters [5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In BF 2 however, the position of the F is not optimal for full reduction of TED and experiments have shown that the F should be implanted separately with an energy approximately 10 times that of the B [8]. Deep and shallow C has been shown to strongly reduce TED but concerns remain over its effect on junction leakage [9].…”
Section: Extending Conventional Implantation With Spike Annealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid implant damage in the SiO 2 gate, channel implantation is usually performed prior to gate oxidation. However, during oxidation, oxidation-enhanced diffusion (OED) due to the injection of self-interstitials contributes significantly to dopant redistribution and makes the desired doping profiles very difficult to obtain [33]. This redistribution is of great concern for boron, the diffusivity of which is mainly determined by the concentration of selfinterstitials.…”
Section: Suppression Of the Boron Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%