2000
DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200002000-00041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supraglottic Combined Frequency Jet Ventilation Versus Subglottic Monofrequent Jet Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Microlaryngeal Surgery

Abstract: This study demonstrates that the combination of high- and low-frequency supraglottic jet ventilation via a jet ventilation laryngoscope provides a better pulmonary gas exchange and allows more accurate airway pressure monitoring during microlaryngeal surgery than subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation via an endotracheal catheter.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[23] Various anesthetic agents and a number of alternative anesthetic techniques have been tried with varying results. [46] The use of intravenous anesthesia with propofol during microlaryngeal surgery is in widespread clinical practice due to its rapidity and quality of awakening. [7–9]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] Various anesthetic agents and a number of alternative anesthetic techniques have been tried with varying results. [46] The use of intravenous anesthesia with propofol during microlaryngeal surgery is in widespread clinical practice due to its rapidity and quality of awakening. [7–9]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 In contrast, tracheal intubation avoids most ventilatory problems at the cost of discomfort for the operator, even if a small-diameter intubation probe is used. High frequency jet ventilation can be used with i) a laryngoscope with a specific channel for jet ventilation (i.e., supraglottic jet ventilation), 10 ii) a tracheal catheter placed through the mouth (i.e., subglottic jet ventilation), 11 or iii) a tracheal catheter placed percutaneously through the cricothyroid membrane. 12 However, high frequency jet ventilation remains a marginal technique owing to the requirement for a specific ventilator and the risk of a specific complication, notably pneumothorax.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the presence of serious airway obstruction, SHFJV has been shown to maintain adequate PO 2 and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) removal [10, 11]. The goal of including LFJV is to increase minute ventilation and improved CO 2 removal [12] by improving lung recruitment leading to better oxygenation [13]. Sütterlin et al, using a porcine model without respiratory disease, compared SHFJV and single-frequency HFJV in the absence of airway obstruction and concluded that both techniques offer adequate ventilation, except for single-frequency HFJV frequencies ≥ 300 min −1 [14].…”
Section: Superimposed Jet Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%