2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface alteration evidence for a mechanism of anoxic dissolution of UO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as well as starting precursors and reaction conditions. 8,13,[52][53][54][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] Our HRTEM results (Table S2) also confirm the nanosize of crystallites.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…as well as starting precursors and reaction conditions. 8,13,[52][53][54][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] Our HRTEM results (Table S2) also confirm the nanosize of crystallites.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It was found that the size of NPs increases (Table S2, Fig. S8-9) after aging (likely, due to the dissolution-precipitation processes 57 ), while partial oxidation was observed by HERFD ( Fig. 3b).…”
Section: Reactivity Of the Uo 2 Npsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key to understanding the long-term rate of release of fission products and actinides from spent nuclear fuel is the rate of dissolution of the UO 2 matrix. , This dissolution will be surface-controlled and involve the evolution of the surface and potential new (secondary) phases forming depending on the environment. In our previous work regarding the dissolution of CeO 2 (a nonradioactive analogue of UO 2 ) and UO 2 (anoxic conditions) we observed nanoscale surface alteration features and secondary phases that were difficult to identify because of their size. , Many unanswered questions surrounding secondary phase formation during anoxic dissolution of UO 2 remain, such as their crystal structure, location, dimensions, and the process by which they form. In addition, it is unclear whether they inhibit the dissolution process and if they support the common assumption that the crystalline actinide dioxides must be covered with an amorphous surface layer as a result of the dissolution. To address all of these concerns, a high-resolution, submicron structural and chemical analysis approach is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In particular, we use a combination of high-angle annular dark field (STEM-HAADF) and medium-angle annular dark field (STEM-MAADF) imaging, which are sensitive to lattice composition and strain, respectively, as well as high-resolution energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (STEM-EDS) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (STEM-EELS) to examine the local chemical evolution of the system. For this purpose, a thin film sample of UO 2 subjected to anoxic dissolution in deionized water described in refs and was studied to reveal surface alteration features and identify secondary phase formations. The increase in resolution provided by atomic-scale chemical imaging of the dissolution process allows us to examine the extent of the amorphous surface hydroxide phase that is often postulated to mediate dissolution. , We find evidence for an alternative passivation mechanism through light element atomic-scale mapping, shedding light on the complex nature of dissolution in this system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Surface chemistry studies were also conducted on the anoxic dissolution of a single-crystalline thin film of UO 2 . 30,31 The authors concluded that dissolution and precipitation of uranium occurs via the tetravalent form instead of the hexavalent one. Another study revealed that the dissolution is initiated at surface grain boundaries and film cracks which was passivated with an oxidized layer via oxygen substitution into the central octahedral interstitial site into the UO 2 lattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%