1985
DOI: 10.1021/es00131a009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface area and porosity of coal fly ash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The BET surface areas (determined from N2 adsorption isotherms, Figure 2) and the D50 particle size as determined by laser diffraction analysis of the calcined powder for each sample are given in Table 3. The surface areas measured for the aluminosilicate powders are an order of magnitude higher than those typically found for fly ash, which are on the order of 0.1 -10 m 2 /g [32][33][34]. The pore size distribution as determined by Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) desorption pore size and volume analysis (for mesopores) and by the Horvath-Kawazoe method with Saito-Foley modification (for micropores)…”
Section: Chemical and Physical Characterisation Of Powdersmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BET surface areas (determined from N2 adsorption isotherms, Figure 2) and the D50 particle size as determined by laser diffraction analysis of the calcined powder for each sample are given in Table 3. The surface areas measured for the aluminosilicate powders are an order of magnitude higher than those typically found for fly ash, which are on the order of 0.1 -10 m 2 /g [32][33][34]. The pore size distribution as determined by Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) desorption pore size and volume analysis (for mesopores) and by the Horvath-Kawazoe method with Saito-Foley modification (for micropores)…”
Section: Chemical and Physical Characterisation Of Powdersmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This can be particularly challenging due to the wide variation of chemical and physical characteristics exhibited by commercial geopolymer precursors where a range of chemical reactivity is observed, Postprint of a paper published in Powder Technology, 29(2016): [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Version of record is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.04.006 3 meaning it is often difficult to distinguish reactive from inert species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith [28] and Helble et al [135] found similar results. In addition, the vast majority of particles (<100 µm diameter) are essentially non-porous in nature [136]. Porous particles are typically hollow cenospheres filled with smaller, essentially non-porous spheres [137].…”
Section: -235mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…area increases with a decrease in particle size, but for the coal fly ash, the surface area mainly depends on the carbon content (Schure et al, 1985). The loss of ignition (LOI) of FA with different particle sizes exhibits a similar trend as the BET surface area, which could be ascribed to the evidence that the coarser particles of coal are less likely to burn completely when compared to finer particles.…”
Section: Characterization Of Raw and Sorted Fa Physico-chemical Propementioning
confidence: 96%