Handbook of Human Motion 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14418-4_184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Electromyography to Study Muscle Coordination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it has been proposed that normalization of EMG amplitude in a standardized submaximal task enables comparison between groups when an MVC is not possible. Unfortunately, the likelihood that participants in the groups perform the normalizing task in a manner that differs between groups, it renders this form of analysis invalid (Hug & Tucker, 2017). If this method is used, this limitation upon the interpretation of data should be considered and discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it has been proposed that normalization of EMG amplitude in a standardized submaximal task enables comparison between groups when an MVC is not possible. Unfortunately, the likelihood that participants in the groups perform the normalizing task in a manner that differs between groups, it renders this form of analysis invalid (Hug & Tucker, 2017). If this method is used, this limitation upon the interpretation of data should be considered and discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various normalization methods have been described (Burden, 2010;Merlo and Campanini, 2016), such as the reference to a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), sub-maximal voluntary contraction, peak/ mean during task, etc. Although normalization to an MVC is commonly used, because it is generally repeatable and provides a reference value that can be interpreted easily, i.e., relative to the maximum possible activation of the muscle (Bolgla and Uhl, 2007;Burden, 2010), this is not always possible and may not be the best method for some needed analyses (Hug and Tucker, 2017). Although some methods have been reported as reliable (Albertus-Kajee et al, 2011;Murley et al, 2010;Tabard-Fougere et al, 2018) and give similar values between sessions, this does not ensure that the normalized EMG amplitude value enables a valid comparison of the level of activation of a muscle(s) for a specific application or research question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The writing speed being unaffected by the pencil grip force and muscular activity holds promise for the application of these cues in the remedial program for disabled persons. Surface Electromyography (sEMG) has proven out to study muscle coordination [110], which can be exploited to understand the poor muscle tone in motor dysgraphia. sEMG signals generated during handwriting have been already applied for character recognition [111,112] and Parkinson's disease diagnosis [113].…”
Section: New Framework For Diagnosis and Assistance Evaluation Of Dys...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, assessment of facial expressions through muscle activation patterns poses challenges for studies of deception. The recording technology must have high resolution and muscle specificity (Hug & Tucker, 2018;Van Boxtel, 2010), while keeping the participants comfortable. Indeed, contemporary facial sEMG devices are cumbersome, unstable, prone to noise, record only for a limited time, rely on expert placement, and produce signals with low spatial resolution (Hug & Tucker, 2018;Wolf, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%