2004
DOI: 10.1163/156856104839338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface free energy of natural and surface-modified tropical and European wood species

Abstract: To describe the wetting properties of various wood types from a practical point of view, the surface free energy of six tropical (guava, almond, teak, cloves, mango and neem) and six European wood species (English oak, Norway maple, hazel, ash, alder and Scots pine) were calculated using contact angles by the sessile-drop method. In order to provide water-repellent characteristics to the samples, they were silanized by a less used silylating reagent (using chloroform solution of trimethylsilyl N,N-dimethylcarb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the magnitude of the adhesion between the spatula and the surface depends not only on the scale of the contact area but also on the location of the annular zone. 49.38 (Wu et al 1994) Material of the surface Concrete 70 (Tasdemir et al 1998) 0.03 (Ay and Topcu 1995) 0.2 (Tasdemir et al 1998) 60 (Oliva et al 2002) SiO 2 72 (Petersen 1982) 5.9 (Petersen 1982) 0.19 (Sitti and Fearing 2003) 160 (Sitti and Fearing 2003) Glass 72 (Shackelford and Alexander 2001) 4.9 (Shackelford and Alexander 2001) 0.166 (Shackelford and Alexander 2001) 49.64 (Wu et al 1994) Wood (Pine) 12 (Panshin and DeZeeuw 1980) 0.029 (Panshin and DeZeeuw 1980) 0.3 (Panshin and DeZeeuw 1980) 58.5 (Mohammed-Ziegler et al 2004) hierarchies in achieving robust and releasable adhesion. At the lowest level of the hierarchical structure (the fi ber radius is 70 nm), the adhesion was found to be 308 nN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the magnitude of the adhesion between the spatula and the surface depends not only on the scale of the contact area but also on the location of the annular zone. 49.38 (Wu et al 1994) Material of the surface Concrete 70 (Tasdemir et al 1998) 0.03 (Ay and Topcu 1995) 0.2 (Tasdemir et al 1998) 60 (Oliva et al 2002) SiO 2 72 (Petersen 1982) 5.9 (Petersen 1982) 0.19 (Sitti and Fearing 2003) 160 (Sitti and Fearing 2003) Glass 72 (Shackelford and Alexander 2001) 4.9 (Shackelford and Alexander 2001) 0.166 (Shackelford and Alexander 2001) 49.64 (Wu et al 1994) Wood (Pine) 12 (Panshin and DeZeeuw 1980) 0.029 (Panshin and DeZeeuw 1980) 0.3 (Panshin and DeZeeuw 1980) 58.5 (Mohammed-Ziegler et al 2004) hierarchies in achieving robust and releasable adhesion. At the lowest level of the hierarchical structure (the fi ber radius is 70 nm), the adhesion was found to be 308 nN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013, Mohammed-Ziegler et al 2004). Gardner et al studied the dynamic wetting behavior of different wood species using the dynamic contact angle method and studied and compared the methods for calculating surface free energy as well (Gardner et al 1991;Wålinder and Gardner 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References for the Data Given in Table 1 Picea abies (Kramer et al 1988;Hasler et al 1994;Boehme and Hora 1996;Mantanis and Young 1997;Nurmi 1997;Bergh et al 1999;Nussbaum 1999;de Meijer et al 2000;Lässig and Močalov 2000;Balode et al 2002;Schulze et al 2002;Matthews and Mackie 2006;Rutz et al 2006;Kaltschmitt et al 2009;Sernek et al 2010;Günther et al 2012;Karl 2012;Navi and Sandberg 2012;EngineeringToolBox 2013) Pinus sylvestris (Bray 1963;Kramer et al 1988;Hasler et al 1994;Wilén et al 1996;Nurmi 1997;Nussbaum 1999;Lässig and Močalov 2000;Schulze et al 2002;Xiao et al 2003;Mohammed-Ziegler et al 2004;Kaltschmitt et al 2009;Karl 2012;Navi and Sandberg 2012;Sedighi et al 2012) Abies alba (Bray 1963;Kramer et al 1988;Becker 1989;de Meijer et al 2000;Lässig and Močalov 2000;Schulze et al 2002;Macias et al 2006;Matthews and Mackie 2006;Wagenführ 2007;…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…(Wilén et al 1996;Labrecque et al 1997;Bungart et al 2000;Diamantidis and Koukios 2000;Lässig and Močalov 2000;Barsoum 2001;Deiller et al 2001;Rutz et al 2006;Wagenführ 2007;Wilkinson et al 2007;Bridgeman et al 2008;Woods 2008;Kaltschmitt et al 2009;Kord and Kord 2011;Buček et al 2012;Karampinis et al 2012;Karl 2012;EngineeringToolBox 2013) Fraxinus excelsior (Bray 1963;Kramer et al 1988;Neirynck et al 2000;Deiller et al 2001;Mohammed-Ziegler et al 2004;Ritter et al 2005;Matthews and Mackie 2006;Petritan et al 2007;Wagenführ 2007;Kaltschmitt et al 2009;Vitasse et al 2009;Kiaei and Samariha 2011;Karl 2012) Fagus sylvatica (Bray 1963;Kramer et al 1988;Hasler et al 1994;Boehme and Hora 1996;Neirynck et al 2000;Helle and Schleser 2004;Ritter et al 2005;Petritan et al 2007;Wagenführ 2007;Kaltschmitt et al 2009;Vitasse et al 2009;Karl 2012 Ac...…”
Section: Methodsunclassified