1996
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(95)06838-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface residual stresses in machined austenitic stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many aspects related to residual stresses in machining have been covered by these analyses. It has been noted that tensile residual stresses can result from the competition between mechanical and thermal effects [6]. The tensile or compressive nature of residual stresses depends not only on machining parameters such as cutting speed, feed rate, rake angle, but also on the tool geometry and the lubrication conditions [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many aspects related to residual stresses in machining have been covered by these analyses. It has been noted that tensile residual stresses can result from the competition between mechanical and thermal effects [6]. The tensile or compressive nature of residual stresses depends not only on machining parameters such as cutting speed, feed rate, rake angle, but also on the tool geometry and the lubrication conditions [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cutting force in the hoop direction is usually the largest and has the most significant effect on the residual stresses on a turned surface. Therefore, it is likely to expect the largest stress in the circumferential/hoop direction (Jang, Watkins, Kozaczek, Hubbard & Cavin, 1996). Machining induced tensile residual stresses displayed sharp gradient in the shallow surface layer of 80 µm depth in which residual stresses experienced rapid drop as shown in Figure 2a.…”
Section: Machining-induced Cold Deformation In Type 304 Stainless Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the specimen with 130 µm removed, the measured value was 463 ± 57 MPa, less than the calculated value. The measured stress could be considered as the stress at the location because the penetration depth of X-ray is about 5 µm [17]. Highly measured stress is probably due to the 100 µm thick cold worked layer.…”
Section: Materials and Test Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%