2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface roughness of microstructured component fabricated by μMIM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these meso/microparts have unique tribology issues because of the variety of materials and the surface conditions (including surface roughness and waviness) produced by the different meso/micromanufacturing processes. Achieving sufficient precision in these parts is becoming more of a challenge because surface roughness levels are approaching part tolerances [1][2][3]. Additionally, the surface roughness of microparts can present problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these meso/microparts have unique tribology issues because of the variety of materials and the surface conditions (including surface roughness and waviness) produced by the different meso/micromanufacturing processes. Achieving sufficient precision in these parts is becoming more of a challenge because surface roughness levels are approaching part tolerances [1][2][3]. Additionally, the surface roughness of microparts can present problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used binder systems include: polyolefin/wax compounds and POM (polyacetal)based systems. The former has been used extensively (usually with LDPE or HDPE) for subsequent thermal debinding [7,10,22,29,29,46], whilst the latter has been used together with catalytic debinding [7,13,24,31,32,45,46,90] PVA-based binders [33] and EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate)-based binders [8,33]. Different binder systems have been used in μPIM to produce all categories of micro-components, i.e.…”
Section: Binder Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, existing microfabrication methods, such as X-ray lithography, electro-forming and excimer laser ablation, have the drawbacks of either low productivity and high production cost or constrained material availability. To overcome these disadvantages, micrometal injection molding (MIM) has been established as a promising route to the mass production of metallic microcomponents (Merz et al, 2004;Tay et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2002). Micrometal injection molding (MIM) is the miniaturization of the conventional metal injection molding process (MIM) and it inherits the features of conventional MIM such as low production cost, geometric complexity, near net-shape, good tolerance and reproducibility (Rota et al, 2002).…”
Section: By Micromimmentioning
confidence: 99%