2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Roughness Prediction using Artificial Neural Network in Hard Turning of AISI H13 Steel with Minimal Cutting Fluid Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The R-value is found to be 0.99845 when the average surface roughness is predicted using '4-7-1' neural network (RMSE = 0.0294). This R-value is greater than the R-value (0.95962) found by Beatrice et al[26] when predicted Ra for minimum quantity lubrication assisted turning of steel. The points at the beginning have shown good fit then it slightly started deviating from the dashed line (actual value = predicted value).…”
contrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The R-value is found to be 0.99845 when the average surface roughness is predicted using '4-7-1' neural network (RMSE = 0.0294). This R-value is greater than the R-value (0.95962) found by Beatrice et al[26] when predicted Ra for minimum quantity lubrication assisted turning of steel. The points at the beginning have shown good fit then it slightly started deviating from the dashed line (actual value = predicted value).…”
contrasting
confidence: 61%
“…They checked the capability of the ANN -GA approach for prediction as well as for optimization by use of real data set which had obtained from real machining experiment. [5]developed an Artificial neural network based predictive model to simulate hard turning of AISI H13 steel with minimum cutting fluid application to predict surface roughness of machined surface in a reference of cutting parameters. They trained networks using different set of training data for a fixed number of cycles and tested them using a set of input or output data reserved for that purpose.…”
Section: Literature Survey  Girish Kant and Kuldip Singhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven approaches use learning algorithms and experimental data to capture underlying influence of control parameters on outputs and build prediction models so that an in-depth understanding of underlying physical processes 2 Complexity is not a prerequisite [9]. Multivariable regression analysis [10,11], response surface methodology [12,13], artificial neural networks (ANN) [14][15][16], and support vector machine (SVM) [17][18][19] are the most widely data-driven approaches applied for modeling machined surface roughness. Other techniques like ensembles also are used for surface roughness prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%