2011
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnr100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surjectivity of the Comparison Map in Bounded Cohomology for Hermitian Lie Groups

Abstract: We prove surjectivity of the comparison map from continuous bounded cohomology to continuous cohomology for Hermitian Lie groups with finite center. For general semisimple Lie groups with finite center, the same argument shows that the image of the comparison map contains all the even generators. Our proof uses a Hirzebruch type proportionality principle in combination with Gromov's results on boundedness of primary characteristic classes and classical results of Cartan and Borel on the cohomology of compact h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conjecture remains open in the specific case of SL(n, R). Prior work includes Hartnick and Ott [14], which confirmed the conjecture for Lie groups of Hermitian type (as well as some other cases). Domic and Toledo gave explicit bounds in degree two [8], and this was later generalized by Clerc and Ørsted in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conjecture remains open in the specific case of SL(n, R). Prior work includes Hartnick and Ott [14], which confirmed the conjecture for Lie groups of Hermitian type (as well as some other cases). Domic and Toledo gave explicit bounds in degree two [8], and this was later generalized by Clerc and Ørsted in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The codimension takes its second minimal value 30 when Y ′ = SL(6, C)/SU (6), hence the gap is 10. If r = 7, then X = SO(14, C)/SO (14) and Y = SO(12, C)/SO (12). The codimension takes its second minimal value 42 when Y ′ is either H 3 × SO(10, C)/SO (10) or SL(7, C)/SU (7), hence the gap is 18.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the conjecture in [9] is that for semisimple Lie groups all these cocycles are bounded. For recent work on this conjecture, see [13,21]. In this last reference, different simplices are used, given by the barycentric subdivision of the geodesic ones, to prove boundedness of the top dimensional cocycle for general connected semisimple Lie groups.…”
Section: So It Remains To Find An Appropriate Splitting Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that item (2) above has in independent interest, and should be compared with the literature on bounded cohomology of Lie groups, c.f. [13,21] The geometric applications stated in Theorem 1.5 are then a direct consequence of the G homotopy invariance of the signature index class, established by Fukumoto in [10] and, for the higher A-genera, of the vanishing of the index class Ind C * r (G) (ð) ∈ K * (C * r (G)) of the spin Dirac operator ð of a G-spin G-proper manifold endowed with a G-metric of positive scalar curvature, established by Guo, Mathai and Wang in [11]. In the odd dimensional case we argue by suspension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) is conjectured to be onto for semisimple Lie groups with finite center (see [12,Conjecture 18.1,page 56]). The conjecture has been proved for Hermitian Lie groups with finite center (see [28]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%