1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90893-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and Morbidity in a Geographically Defined Population of Low Birthweight Infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details of these assessments have been published. [15][16][17][18][19][20] For the purposes of this study, by measuring the head circumference in these children at birth, near term at discharge, and at 4 and 15 years of age, four periods of growth could be examined: antenatal, immediate postnatal, infancy, and early childhood. The occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) was extracted from the clinical record for each time point and converted into a standard deviation score (z score) taking in to account the sex and age at the time of measurement.…”
Section: Population and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of these assessments have been published. [15][16][17][18][19][20] For the purposes of this study, by measuring the head circumference in these children at birth, near term at discharge, and at 4 and 15 years of age, four periods of growth could be examined: antenatal, immediate postnatal, infancy, and early childhood. The occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) was extracted from the clinical record for each time point and converted into a standard deviation score (z score) taking in to account the sex and age at the time of measurement.…”
Section: Population and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obstetric and neonatal records were abstracted for demographic and clinical details of mother and birth weight of the child. The children were examined at age 3 years18 and again at age 8 years19 to determine the prevalence of clinical disability. At the 8 year follow up of the index population, for those children attending normal school, an age and sex matched comparison from the same school was also assessed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially the combination of these factors with early, abnormal neurological signs results in an unfavourable prognosis regarding neurodevelopmental and motor outcome, learning capabilities, and language acquisition [14,17,23,30,35]. GA, IVH, periventricular leucomalacia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, socio-economic status, assisted ventilation and hyperbilirubinaemia are reported to be important neonatal risk factors [3,4,7,11,15,28,30,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%