2002
DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200208000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival Statistics Gone Awry

Abstract: Resections for pancreatic cancer have been performed for 65 years, with approximately 20,000 reported. A number of authors claim a 5-year survival rate of 30% to 58%. Review of the literature reveals only about 1,200 5-year survivors; however, 10 times as many individual resected survivors have been reported (in various countries), and nonresected survivors are overlooked. This high survival percentage is obtained by reducing the subset on which calculations are based and by using methods such as the Kaplan-Me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, surgical resection in patients with localized pancreatic cancer is still underused [14]. Retrospective analyses of data from patients treated in our department between 1996 and 2005 revealed a 5-year survival rate of 20% for R0 patients, which is in agreement with the literature, even though some authors deny the existence of 5-year survivors [4]. With respect to the classification of the pancreatic head resections evaluated retrospectively, the percentage of R1 resections (22.6%) also mirrors the literature [12, 15, 23, 27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, surgical resection in patients with localized pancreatic cancer is still underused [14]. Retrospective analyses of data from patients treated in our department between 1996 and 2005 revealed a 5-year survival rate of 20% for R0 patients, which is in agreement with the literature, even though some authors deny the existence of 5-year survivors [4]. With respect to the classification of the pancreatic head resections evaluated retrospectively, the percentage of R1 resections (22.6%) also mirrors the literature [12, 15, 23, 27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It is usually too late for operation. 2) As mentioned by Gudjonsson [26], hospital-based follow-up studies tended to backtrack and figure out the actual number of survivors from the actuarial figures without knowing how many patients were lost to follow-up and when. Since Kaplan-Meier method has no limitation and no compulsory explanation on losses (censoring), the survival rates by Kaplan-Meier methods would be overestimated as increased censoring happened especially for those hospital-based pancreatic cancer studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual number of survivors with actuarial calculation is therefore known in 205 of the 424 reports or 48.3%. The actuarial and actual percentage figures can therefore be compared, as demonstrated previously [29, 30], and reveal that the actuarial percentage is on average 2.75 higher than the actual percentage. This figure has therefore been used to estimate the number of survivors and the survival percentage in the relevant studies where only the actuarial percentage has been published.…”
Section: Survival Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 86%