2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10696-013-9172-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of optimal train schedules to stochastic disturbances of process times

Abstract: This work focuses on the stochastic evaluation of train schedules computed by a microscopic scheduler of railway operations based on deterministic information. The research question is to assess the degree of sensitivity of various scheduling algorithms to variations in process times (running and dwell times). In fact, the objective of railway traffic management is to reduce delay propagation and to increase disturbance robustness of train schedules at a network scale. We present a quantitative study of traffi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, measures are based on punctuality, delays, number of violated connections, or number of trains being on-time to a station (possibly weighted by the number of passengers affected). For example, Büker and Seybold (2012) measure punctuality, mean delay and delay variance, Larsen et al (2013) use secondary and total delays as performance indicators and Medeossi et al (2011) measure the conflict probability. All of the examples above are based on perturbing a timetable with observed or simulated disturbances.…”
Section: Traffic Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, measures are based on punctuality, delays, number of violated connections, or number of trains being on-time to a station (possibly weighted by the number of passengers affected). For example, Büker and Seybold (2012) measure punctuality, mean delay and delay variance, Larsen et al (2013) use secondary and total delays as performance indicators and Medeossi et al (2011) measure the conflict probability. All of the examples above are based on perturbing a timetable with observed or simulated disturbances.…”
Section: Traffic Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, micro-simulation approaches are better able to take into account the stochasticity of the analysed phenomenon which lies in several factors: the temporal and spatial distribution of passengers, passenger and train driver behaviours, and train delays. Stochastic variations in dwell time are taken into account in [19], while [20] addressed the problem by determining dwell times by separating them into both deterministic and stochastic sub-processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, it is presented in the form of average delay (Khan and Zhou [11], Fischetti et al [9], Kroon et al [14], and Vromans et al [20]), secondary and total delay (Larsen et al [15]), punctuality (Andersson et al [3]), and the number of affected passengers (Dewilde et al [8]). However, the importance of the ex-ante measures cannot be denied because the traffic performance is based on the design quality of the timetable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%