“…From the abovementioned five stakeholders suggested by UNEP/SETAC (2009), social impacts on local communities are assessed by 39.5% of the studies, namely those evaluating impacts on cultural heritage, local employment generation, the externalities and the public acceptance of the bridge and its aesthetics. The stakeholder Society is taken into account by 14.3% of the studies, namely those considering impacts on the development of local economies (Ugwu et al, 2006;Aghdaie et al, 2012;Bansal et al, 2017;Cau & Hong, 2017;Navarro et al, 2018aNavarro et al, , 2018bNavarro et al, , 2018cSalem et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018), on the social wellbeing and the inclusion of innovation (Wang et al, 2010;Ugwu et al, 2006) in the bridge design. The stakeholder Workers is assessed by 19.3% of the articles, which consider the health and safety related to working conditions as a main source of social impacts.…”