2017
DOI: 10.21041/ra.v7i1.171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability evaluation of two iconic bridge corridors under construction using Fuzzy Vikor technique: A case study

Abstract: Sustainability evaluation of two iconic bridge corridors under construction using Fuzzy Vikor technique: A case studyABSTRACTTwo iconic bridge projects over river Yamuna in Delhi under construction have been evaluated from sustainability criteria using Fuzzy-Vikor technique. The Barapulla elevated road project was more found to be more sustainable in comparison to the Signature bridge project in terms of various indicators identified during the study. In general, the goals of providing sustainable features are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different construction methods for a particular case study have been assessed from a sustainable perspective assuming an intuitionistic fuzzy method with likelihood preferences by Chen (2014Chen ( , 2015Chen ( , 2016 and Wang & Chen (2015). Bansal et al (2017) assess the sustainability of two bridge projects under construction in Delhi over the Yamuna River. Tan et al (2020) investigates the management of the recently collapsed Zijin Bridge in China, including sustainable criteria in the evaluation.…”
Section: Overview Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different construction methods for a particular case study have been assessed from a sustainable perspective assuming an intuitionistic fuzzy method with likelihood preferences by Chen (2014Chen ( , 2015Chen ( , 2016 and Wang & Chen (2015). Bansal et al (2017) assess the sustainability of two bridge projects under construction in Delhi over the Yamuna River. Tan et al (2020) investigates the management of the recently collapsed Zijin Bridge in China, including sustainable criteria in the evaluation.…”
Section: Overview Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the abovementioned five stakeholders suggested by UNEP/SETAC (2009), social impacts on local communities are assessed by 39.5% of the studies, namely those evaluating impacts on cultural heritage, local employment generation, the externalities and the public acceptance of the bridge and its aesthetics. The stakeholder Society is taken into account by 14.3% of the studies, namely those considering impacts on the development of local economies (Ugwu et al, 2006;Aghdaie et al, 2012;Bansal et al, 2017;Cau & Hong, 2017;Navarro et al, 2018aNavarro et al, , 2018bNavarro et al, , 2018cSalem et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018), on the social wellbeing and the inclusion of innovation (Wang et al, 2010;Ugwu et al, 2006) in the bridge design. The stakeholder Workers is assessed by 19.3% of the articles, which consider the health and safety related to working conditions as a main source of social impacts.…”
Section: Distribution Based On the Sustainability Dimension Assessedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VIKOR is a MCDM method introduced by Opricovic [20] overcome the limitations of existing MCDM techniques where decision problems involve conflicting criteria. VIKOR is also a popular assessment tool, that has been used as well to solve the evaluation performance of a variety of infrastructures, such as bridges [21][22][23], airport infrastructures [24] or logistic centers [25].…”
Section: Vikormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, small-span bridges are generally underestimated considering the lack of executive design and technical monitoring in their construction, non-existent maintenance, evident signs of abandonment including poor conditions for use and the emergence of different pathologies or a lack of attention from the public authorities, thus generating sustainability issues [23]. In this regard, the rationalization of the process of building structures-including reducing costs [24][25][26], social impacts [27,28] and environmental impacts [29,30]-should be addressed in the design phase [31]. The environmental impact of bridges has been highlighted due to the consumption of resources [32]; it has been widely demonstrated that more sustainable construction benefits humanity [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%