Public Affairs and Administration 2015
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8358-7.ch014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability of E-Government Success

Abstract: The long-term success of e-government initiatives is of paramount importance, especially for developing countries, which face challenges such as limited budget, donor dependence, transfer of technology, short-term involvement of non-local agents, and relatively unstable political and economic environment. Although e-government success and sustainability are both relevant concepts to assess IT-enabled administrative processes in practice, e-government research has not yet elaborated the two concepts in an integ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kuhbanani et al (2021) stated that humans have the power to produce sustainable development to fulfill their requirements without affecting future generations' demands. Klischewski and Lessa (2012) identified about 18 enablers of e‐government sustainability: Continuously matching available resources, cultivating an influential champion, using IT to enhance development, independent from external assistance, developing senses of ownership, sustaining political leadership, ongoing monitoring and evaluation, understanding of local political dynamics, continuously meet stockholders' need, institutionalize the project into vision. Furthermore, Joshi and Islam (2018) investigated the five determinants of e‐government sustainability from the existing e‐government maturity models which are detailed Assimilation process, Streamlined services, State‐of‐the‐art Technology, Agile Accessibility, Awareness and Trust among Citizens.…”
Section: Determinants Of E‐government Maturitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuhbanani et al (2021) stated that humans have the power to produce sustainable development to fulfill their requirements without affecting future generations' demands. Klischewski and Lessa (2012) identified about 18 enablers of e‐government sustainability: Continuously matching available resources, cultivating an influential champion, using IT to enhance development, independent from external assistance, developing senses of ownership, sustaining political leadership, ongoing monitoring and evaluation, understanding of local political dynamics, continuously meet stockholders' need, institutionalize the project into vision. Furthermore, Joshi and Islam (2018) investigated the five determinants of e‐government sustainability from the existing e‐government maturity models which are detailed Assimilation process, Streamlined services, State‐of‐the‐art Technology, Agile Accessibility, Awareness and Trust among Citizens.…”
Section: Determinants Of E‐government Maturitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As iniciativas de e-gov podem potencializar a melhoria dos serviços públicos e servir também para aumentar a eficiência e a efetividade de processos de trabalho interno e ampliar a participação dos cidadãos nos processos de tomada de decisão (KLISCHEWSKI;LESSA, 2015). Tal argumento é corroborado pela visão de Maciel (2008), que caracteriza o e-gov como o conjunto de estratégias utilizadas pelo governo para uso dos recursos das Tecnologias de Informação e da Comunicação -TICs, com o intuito de modernizar a máquina administrativa e atender as necessidades do cidadão.…”
Section: Governo Eletrônico E Coprodução De E-serviços Públicosunclassified
“…In line with this, [19] also argues that success in the new paradigm is measured against the goal of sustainable economic, ecological, and social progress, rather than profits and growth; and its ultimate objective is to sustain a desirable quality of life, which requires a balance of economic, social, and ecological success. See [20] for review on the multi-dimensional nature of the two concepts, different views on the concepts, their enablers, and evaluation dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%