Sustainable development and environmental partnership at the regional scale: the case of Sustainability North West

Abstract

The 1990s can be characterized by the emergence of at least three trends. First sustainable development has become the mantra that should underpin all decision making. Second the delivery of public goods and services is increasingly based on a partnership between the public, private and voluntary sectors. Third, and perhaps most recently, there has been the re‐emergence of the regional level of governance. Much has been written about the way partnerships are necessary to deliver sustainable development at the local and national levels of government, but there is less known or understood about the intermediate tier of governance. In this paper we wish to explore these general trends before focusing on a regional partnership that has as its core aim the delivery of sustainable development in the North West of England. The region was the first to develop a multi‐sectoral partnership agency promoting sustainable development. Launched in 1996, Sustainability North West is a unique cross‐ and multi‐sectoral regional agency designed to deliver sustainable development. This paper will consider the origins and structure of the organization and its achievements in the first few years of activity, and evaluate its applicability to other regional contexts. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment

The natural advantage of regions: linking sustainability, innovation, and regional development in Australia

“…The aim was not a survey of limited variables across a region, but to obtain detailed contextual information about business activities, values, and motivations (Yin, 2003;Flyvbjerg, 2001). A structured research design linked the literature, research questions and conceptual framework to the interview instrument as a means of building construct validity (Shaw and Kidd, 2001). The instrument was piloted with an existing firm in a different region.…”

“…This is a logical proposition. With regional planning on the policy agenda (Bellamy et al, 2003;Hargraves and Smith, 2005;Shaw and Kidd, 2001) and the sustainability literature advocating a regional approach as an appropriate scale for integration of economic and environmental concerns, the region should be considered an appropriate scale for linking ecological and socio-economic processes. This is supported by the concept of industrial ecology that advocates increased efficiency of material and energy flows within a regional industrial system, analogous to material flows within an ecosystem where waste is treated as a resource and systems are holistic rather than linear (Burstrom and Korhonen, 2001).…”

Orality in environmental planning

“…A key element in this development is an alternative way of dealing with different interests and perspectives in society, not only by negotiations within the existing political structures, ending up in confrontations in parliaments or other representative bodies, but by discussions and negotiations with societal groups, directly, intentionally and in an early phase in the policy process. In environmental planning, this development is clearly visible in at least a couple of European countries, as can be illustrated by contributions in this journal regarding the usage of CFCs, the reduction of packaging wastes, energy conservation, the managing of contaminated soil (Sairinen and Teittinen, 1999), local green planning (Coenen, 1998), the preservation of areas with outstanding natural beauty (Kitchen, 2000), energy production (Glasbergen and Groenenberg, 2001) or regional sustainable development (Shaw and Kidd, 2001). This interaction can mean (i) interaction between administrators ('officials') and citizens and/or (ii) interaction between different groups of citizens with a different relation with their environments (for recreation, housing, farming etc) and therefore different interests and perspectives.…”

Decision-making by regional bodies for natural resource management in Australia: current processes and capacity gaps

“…This devolution recognises that action for NRM is required at a number of spatial and governmental levels (Shaw & Kidd 2001) and that a partnership approach between government agencies and regional communities for NRM decision-making has Downloaded by [Queensland University of Technology] at 11:15 13 October 2014 western states (Ryan & Bidwell 2007). Such approaches have become popular as a stakeholder-supported way to address conflict in water management (Ryan & Bidwell 2007), for community action in partnerships with agencies, and for the development of conservation strategies suited to regions (Habron 2003).…”

“…Keywords: Integration, catchment, prioritisation, decision-making, evaluation advantages (Shaw & Kidd 2001;O'Neill 2005), although it also has its limitations (Robins & Dovers 2007a;ANAO 2008).…”