“…We suggest this is, however, actually a benefit: measurement of ocular compliance, unlike alternative methods [e.g., strip testing (Phillips and McBrien, 1995 ; Elsheikh and Anderson, 2005 ; Lari et al, 2012 ; Hatami-Marbini and Rahimi, 2014 ), compression (Battaglioli and Kamm, 1984 ; Mortazavi et al, 2009 ; Boazak et al, 2019 )] evaluates the eye in its natural geometrical configuration. Further, ocular compliance measurements are faster and easier to carry out in small murine eyes as compared to alternatives (Myers et al, 2010 ; Hannon et al, 2019 ), and they do not require fixation of the eye to a mounting block, which can potentially introduce non-physiological boundary conditions. A third possible limitation was the use of eye mass to calculate eye volume, which in turn was used to calculate ϕ norm .…”