1976
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7225(76)90088-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetrical frictionless indentation over a uniformly expanding contact region—I. Basic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical of such problems are those that exhibit no self-similarity, or include super-Rayleigh/subseismic contact-zone velocities and frictional effects. Nevertheless, considerable progress has been made in elastodynamic contact problems during the last two decades (Bedding and Willis [5,6], Willis [7,8], Brock 1,[9][10][11][12][13][14] and Cherepanov [15]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical of such problems are those that exhibit no self-similarity, or include super-Rayleigh/subseismic contact-zone velocities and frictional effects. Nevertheless, considerable progress has been made in elastodynamic contact problems during the last two decades (Bedding and Willis [5,6], Willis [7,8], Brock 1,[9][10][11][12][13][14] and Cherepanov [15]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constant indentor speed in the wedge case, or the constant indentor acceleration in the parabolic case, in conjunction with dimensional considerations lead us to anticipate a self-similar solution in which certain fields (particle velocities or accelerations in the elastic medium) are homogeneous and the contact region expands at uniform velocity ~ (see e.g. Brock [9,12]). Notice also in the wedge case that it is the velocity ~ which determines the dynamic character of the problem (depending upon the magnitude of ~ in respect to the elastic-wave velocities), not the punch velocity V, which will generally be much lower than ~, since small strain considerations demand that the inclination of the wedge face (re -20)/2 << 1 (where 0 is the half-wedge angle).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brock has largely contributed to this field by establishing some very effective procedures in applying the Busemann-Chaplygin technique. He has also solved numerous elastodynamic contact problems [20][21][22][23] by the same methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps a more cogent argument is that the sub-Rayleigh solution, which has been independently obtained and discussed by numerous authors [20,[24][25][26][27][28][29], also contains a disturbance of the same form in the vertical velocity v~(x, O, t) at the Rayleigh points, which of course are now outside the contact area. However, as we have shown in Section 4.3.1, the disturbance does not affect the satisfaction of the contact boundary conditions and hence if it is deemed to be unacceptable, it must be equally unacceptable when it occurs outside the contact region.…”
Section: Inadmissible Singularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The half-plane is assumed to be at rest and stress-free at time t = 0. Many authors [20,[24][25][26][27][28][29] have considered this problem in the sub-Rayleigh regime, a < ca, for which the inequalities demand that the traction be bounded at Ixl --at and lead to a unique solution. However, as in Section 2.4, it is found that the bounded solution violates the inequalities if ca < a < ci, but that infinitely many singular solutions can be found which satisfy them.…”
Section: Uy(xot)> Vt-lxltan(~-~-);lxl>atmentioning
confidence: 99%