2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.161403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetry-dependent phonon renormalization in monolayer MoS2transistor

Abstract: Strong electron-phonon interaction which limits electronic mobility of semiconductors can also have significant effects on phonon frequencies. The latter is the key to the use of Raman spectroscopy for nondestructive characterization of doping in graphene-based devices. Using in-situ Raman scattering from single layer MoS2 electrochemically top-gated field effect transistor (FET), we show softening and broadening of A1g phonon with electron doping whereas the other Raman active E 1 2g mode remains essentially … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

97
760
9
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 982 publications
(885 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
97
760
9
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2a,b shows the V tg -dependent Raman spectra measured from a bilayer MoS 2 sample, with excitation laser of 532 and 633 nm, respectively (phonon assignment is shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). The gate-dependent behavior of A 1g mode with 532 nm excitation in Figure 2a is in good agreement with previous reports: [15,23] The peak redshifts and broadens with increasing electron doping. On the other hand, E 2g 1 mode is less sensitive to electron doping due to the weaker electron-phonon coupling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2a,b shows the V tg -dependent Raman spectra measured from a bilayer MoS 2 sample, with excitation laser of 532 and 633 nm, respectively (phonon assignment is shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). The gate-dependent behavior of A 1g mode with 532 nm excitation in Figure 2a is in good agreement with previous reports: [15,23] The peak redshifts and broadens with increasing electron doping. On the other hand, E 2g 1 mode is less sensitive to electron doping due to the weaker electron-phonon coupling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Theoretical calculations also indicate that the electron-phonon coupling for A 1g mode is much stronger than that of the E 2g 1 mode, which explains why E 2g 1 mode is insensitive to changes in electron concentration. [15] The dependence of Raman spectroscopy on the excitation energy may provide further information of the material properties, such as Davydov splitting and exciton-phonon coupling under resonant condition. [17][18][19][20] However, previous Raman spectroscopy studies in MoS 2 with electrostatic (2 of 6) 1701039 www.small-journal.com doping have not addressed the influence of excitation energy on the phonon behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Raman A'1 peak of MoS2 blue-shifts and its intensity increases (relative to E'), thus indicating that MoS2 is less n-doped (or a decrease in the electron concentration). 44,45 The blue-shift of the WSe2 Raman A'1 peak implies that the WSe2 may become less p-doped (Supporting Figure S3 shows that in our separate experiment, p-doping from AuCl4 -causes a red-shift of Raman A'1 peak in monolayer WSe2). These phenomena suggest that the electrons transfer from MoS2 to WSe2, which is expected for the PN-junction composed by the p-type WSe2 and n-type MoS2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…2c) 39,40 . The position of the A 1g peak is known to vary with doping 41 , however as this is not the case with the more strain sensitive E 1 2g mode, its peak position can be used as a reliable way to measure the internal strain of monolayer MoS 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%