2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00204-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synaptic transfer of dynamic motion information between identified neurons in the visual system of the blowfly

Abstract: Abstract-Synaptic transmission is usually studied in vitro with electrical stimulation replacing the natural input of the system. In contrast, we analyzed in vivo transfer of visual motion information from graded-potential presynaptic to spiking postsynaptic neurons in the fly. Motion in the null direction leads to hyperpolarization of the presynaptic neuron but does not much influence the postsynaptic cell, because its firing rate is already low during rest, giving only little scope for further reductions. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
56
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The V1 cell receives visual motion information from the four most frontal VS cells and transforms the resulting postsynaptic potentials into spike activity (Kurtz et al, 2001). This synaptic connection provides linear and robust transfer of information from VS to V1 on fluctuations in motion velocity of up to 10 Hz (Warzecha et al, 2003;Kalb et al, 2006;Beckers et al, 2007). By simultaneous recordings of presynaptic and postsynaptic activity, we were able to narrow the potential sites of adaptation-induced effects: adaptation effects that are present in the V1 cell, but not in VS cells, arise during synaptic transfer or in the postsynaptic cell itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The V1 cell receives visual motion information from the four most frontal VS cells and transforms the resulting postsynaptic potentials into spike activity (Kurtz et al, 2001). This synaptic connection provides linear and robust transfer of information from VS to V1 on fluctuations in motion velocity of up to 10 Hz (Warzecha et al, 2003;Kalb et al, 2006;Beckers et al, 2007). By simultaneous recordings of presynaptic and postsynaptic activity, we were able to narrow the potential sites of adaptation-induced effects: adaptation effects that are present in the V1 cell, but not in VS cells, arise during synaptic transfer or in the postsynaptic cell itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For all coherence calculations, the presynaptic and postsynaptic signals were shifted according to the response latency obtained from the cross-correlation of the responses and the velocity profile of the motion stimulus. The reconstruction followed well established linear filtering procedures (Gabbiani and Koch, 1998;Warzecha et al, 2003). In brief, when reconstructing a time-dependent stimulus s(t) from a response r(t), the reverse linear filter that minimizes the mean square error between the reconstructed stimulus and s(t) is given in frequency space by the following:…”
Section: Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During ipsilateral upward motion their membrane potential hyperpolarizes. VS-cells are presynaptic to a spiking neuron, the V1-cell, which relays the motion information to the contralateral brain hemisphere [14,27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for a given level of membrane potential noise the frequency range of membrane potential fluctuations induced by a stimulus determines whether a neuron can use a rate code or a temporal code. Since the computations underlying motion detection inevitably require time constants of some tens of milliseconds (Borst and Egelhaaf 1989), they attenuate the neural responses to high-frequency fluctuations in pattern velocity Warzecha et al 1998Warzecha et al , 2003 (Fig. 3D).…”
Section: Precision Of Neuronal Encoding Of Visual Motion Information:mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D). Hence, only when the velocity changes are very rapid and large the resulting depolarisations of the motion-sensitive neuron are sufficiently pronounced to elicit spikes with a millisecond precision (Ruyter van Steveninck and Bialek 1995;Warzecha and Egelhaaf 2001;Ruyter van Steveninck et al 2001;Warzecha et al 2003). Otherwise, the exact timing of spikes is determined mostly by membrane potential noise and visual motion is most likely represented by the spike rate (Fig.…”
Section: Precision Of Neuronal Encoding Of Visual Motion Information:mentioning
confidence: 99%