Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium and the 13th European Conference on Foundations of Software Engineering 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2025113.2025188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synoptic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the purely algorithmic methods, the reference k-tails algorithm [17] can mine exact, but potentially complicated, Markov models of applications. This algorithm underlies the Synoptic 1 tool [9] that can learn Markov models of processes. The Invarimint tool [18] is also based on k-tails but produces simpler, socalled declarative automata, without probabilities on the edges.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the purely algorithmic methods, the reference k-tails algorithm [17] can mine exact, but potentially complicated, Markov models of applications. This algorithm underlies the Synoptic 1 tool [9] that can learn Markov models of processes. The Invarimint tool [18] is also based on k-tails but produces simpler, socalled declarative automata, without probabilities on the edges.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main contributions are: (i) designing an automated technique for learning the behavior of Android applications, (ii) developing practical algorithms for building the automata, (iii) prototyping our method based on Python scripts, and (iv) evaluating its performance through extensive experiments, with a comparison to other automata learning algorithms, namely Synoptic [9] and Invarimint [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying both the properties and the validation techniques that are suitable for supporting the study of these properties remains open research. We have begun using a dynamic model-inference approach [2], [3], [4] to explore which simulation properties can be verified automatically during, as well as after, the simulation execution. We are interested in the degree to which this approach can be complemented by static verification of these properties.…”
Section: Simulation Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%