2013
DOI: 10.1080/00958972.2013.848274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of dinuclear (Hedta)Ru(III) complexes with N-heterocyclic ligands: magnetic properties and DNA-binding studies

Abstract: Two ruthenium(III) complexes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetate(edta), viz. [{Ru(Hedta)} 2 L]· xH 2 O L = 4,4′-bipyridine(bpy) (1) and 4,4′-azopyridine(Azpy) (2), have been synthesized by the reaction between K[Ru(Hedta)Cl]·1.5H 2 O and the corresponding N-heterocycles. Complex 1 was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The products were characterized by IR, UV-vis, cyclic voltammetry, and magnetic techniques. Their DNA-binding activities were investigated using electronic absorption spectroscop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon addition of CT DNA, the emission intensity in spectra of the complexes increased. These results may be attributed that the binding affinity increased in the sequence ofloxacin < 1 < 2 < 3, which is attributed to the hydrophobic and steric hindrance of the co-ligand [32]. These data also agree with the aforementioned study, indicating that the DNA-binding behavior is related to the antitumor activity of the Ru(II) complexes [33].…”
Section: Fluorescence Emission Titrationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Upon addition of CT DNA, the emission intensity in spectra of the complexes increased. These results may be attributed that the binding affinity increased in the sequence ofloxacin < 1 < 2 < 3, which is attributed to the hydrophobic and steric hindrance of the co-ligand [32]. These data also agree with the aforementioned study, indicating that the DNA-binding behavior is related to the antitumor activity of the Ru(II) complexes [33].…”
Section: Fluorescence Emission Titrationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Intrinsic binding constants (K b ) of 1.97 and 1.18 × 10 5 M −1 were obtained for Λ-1 and Δ-1, respectively. The binding affinity of both isomers is comparable with that of [Ru(L)(bpy) 2 ]ClO 4 (L = (4-chloro-phenyl)-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-diazene and (4-nitro-phenyl)-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-diazene)[31,32], and higher than that of [RuX 2 (PPh 3 )L] (X = Cl, Br, L = 3-(benzothiazol-2-yliminomethyl)-naphthalen-2-ol)[33][34][35]. The binding of both isomers with c-myc G4 DNA has also been confirmed using ITC experiments and the results are listed in table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%