“…Concerning the substituent on the sulphonamide nitrogen, hydrogen or small groups (methyl, ethyl, or acetonitrile) resulted in optimal potency for every series ( 2 , 8a , 9a , 13 – 16 , 21 – 25, and 32 – 35 ), whereas larger substituents such as acetates ( 5 , 17 , 26 , 29 , and 36 ), carboxylates ( 7 and 27 ), or benzyls ( 10b – c , 18 , and 37 ) showed reduced potencies or rendered the compounds inactive, except for the benzyl group of the 3,4,5- trisubstituted compound 10a of the series 1. These results are different from previously described sulphonamides, including those with TMP phenyl rings, where methyl groups are usually strongly preferred 3 , 46 , 47 . Acetonitrile substitutions on the sulphonamide nitrogen ( 16 , 25 , and 35 ) showed similar potencies (IC 50 HeLa = 407, 36, and 500 nM, respectively) with respect to the less polar methylated analogs ( 14 , 24 , and 33 ) (IC 50 HeLa = 557, 33, and 413 nM, respectively).…”