2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2012.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, characterization, and DNA-binding studies of ruthenium complexes [Ru(tpy)(ptn)]2+ and Ru(dmtpy)(ptn)]2+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Viscosity changes were measured using CT DNA with increasing concentrations of the complexes as shown in figure 5. The effects of ofloxacin, 1, 2, and 3 versus [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ and EB (ethidium bromide) on the relative viscosity of rod-like DNA are shown in figure 5. [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ interacts with DNA in a classical electrostatic effect with little changes in the viscosity of CT DNA and EB interacts with DNA in a classical intercalating mode showing increasing viscosity [35,36]. The relative viscosity of the DNA does not change as the amounts of ofloxacin, 1, 2, and 3 increase, which is similar with [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ .…”
Section: Viscosity Measurementssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Viscosity changes were measured using CT DNA with increasing concentrations of the complexes as shown in figure 5. The effects of ofloxacin, 1, 2, and 3 versus [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ and EB (ethidium bromide) on the relative viscosity of rod-like DNA are shown in figure 5. [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ interacts with DNA in a classical electrostatic effect with little changes in the viscosity of CT DNA and EB interacts with DNA in a classical intercalating mode showing increasing viscosity [35,36]. The relative viscosity of the DNA does not change as the amounts of ofloxacin, 1, 2, and 3 increase, which is similar with [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ .…”
Section: Viscosity Measurementssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…n (bases/comp) These data indicate that both isomers enhance the thermodynamic stability of c-myc oligomer [39,40]. These data are in agreement with those above, indicating that the Λ-isomer binds with c-myc G-quadruplex DNA more tightly than does the Δ-isomer.…”
Section: Compsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Furthermore, two Ru II complexes with tridentate ligands of poorer planarity were found to induce aB -Z conformational transition of DNA. [39] This is comparable to the fact that D-Ru2 and L-Ru2 with a smallerp lanara rea can transform B-DNA to Z-DNA. Consequently,t he planarity and length of ligands are closely related to the biological effects of D-Ru1, L-Ru1, D-Ru2, L-Ru2, D-Ru3,a nd L-Ru3.I na ddition, the extent of the hypochromism and the intrinsic binding constants K b of the complexes when bound to DNA increase in the order of (Table S3, Figure S24, Supporting Information), suggesting that D-Ru2, L-Ru2, D-Ru3,a nd L-Ru3 with larger planar ligands can bind more strongly to DNA throughi ntercalation comparedt oD-Ru1 and L-Ru1.W e can conclude that the effect of ligand planarity on the interaction of complexes with DNA is the keyf actor for regulating DNA conformation.…”
Section: Effects Of Ligand Planarity On the Interaction Of Complexes mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[20] Recently,r uthenium(II) complexes have attracted increasing attention in the design of DNA binding and recognition agents [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] as well as anticancer drugs targeting DNA. [33][34][35][36][37][38] SomeD NA intercalative Ru II complexes have been previously reported to induce DNA B-Z conformational transfer, [39][40][41][42] as well as some Ru II DNA intercalating complexes,w hichc an con-denseD NA. [42][43][44][45][46][47] In this work,o ur results serve to demonstrate the structurale ffect of DNA intercalators on their interference with DNA high-order structures, and to determine the link betweent he B-Z DNA conformational transformation andD NA condensation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%