Synthesis of 2,2-dimethyl-1-carbapenam derivatives via an intramolecular michael-type reaction

Shibuya, Masayuki; Kuretani, Masahiko; Kubota, Seiju

doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(01)82981-6

Cited by 11 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[42] Best results were obtained when (S)-prolinol (82) was used as a nucleophile in the reaction with 1-nitrocyclohexene (83) giving the 1,4-product 84 in a short reaction time with high yield and facial selectivity (Scheme 26). Scheme 26 An intramolecular variant of the aza Michael reaction was used by Shibyua et al [43] in the construction of 2,2-dimethyl-1-carbapenam. The approach has been adapted by Barrett and co-workers to the synthesis of the oxapenam 86.…”

Section: Scheme 23mentioning

confidence: 99%

Asymmetric Michael Additions to Nitroalkenes

2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The asymmetric conjugate addition of various carbon and heteroatom nucleophiles to nitroalkenes as a tool for the construction of highly functionalized synthetic building blocks is presented. Diastereoselective, substrate-controlled 1,4-additions are also included. Besides auxiliary controlled asymmetric Michael additions, external asymmetric versions employing enantiopure additives, addition-elimination processes with enantiopure leaving groups, and catalytic asym-

show abstract

Section: Scheme 23mentioning

confidence: 99%

Asymmetric Michael Additions to Nitroalkenes

2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The IntramolecularMichael Reaction

et al. 1995

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Like its intermolecular counterpart, the intramolecular Michael reaction involves the addition of a nucleophile, often referred to as the donor, to an acceptor, usually an olefin bearing one or more functional groups capable of stabilizing a carbanion. Strictly speaking, the term Michael reaction refers to the 1,4‐, or conjugate, addition of a carbanion to an acceptor under basic conditions. However, just as the scope of a previous review dealing with the Michael reaction was expanded to encompass a wide range of acceptors and noncarbon‐centered donors, so too has the scope of this chapter. Furthermore, reactions occurring under both basic and acidic conditions are discussed. As suggested by the name, the intramolecular Michael reaction most often leads to the formation of a ring, either carbo‐ or heterocyclic. However, there are many examples of sequential, or tandem, Michael reactions wherein the first inter‐ or intramolecular Michael reaction is followed directly by an intramolecular variant leading to the formation of more than one ring. In other instances, a nucleophile is delivered to the β‐carbon atom of an acceptor in a process which does not lead to the production of a ring. These transformations are referred to as heteroconjugate addition reactions. In contrast to the intermolecular counterpart, the intramolecular Michael reaction has been formally reviewed only once. Two contemporary publications, however, have focused on the reaction and serve to highlight recent developments. The first example dates back to 1898 when Guthzeit reported that on standing at room temperature for a year, or upon treatment with a “small amount” of pyridine, ethyl α‐carboxyglutaconate transforms to the “bimeric” ester. Subsequent reinvestigation by Ingold and co‐workers led to the revised structure and to the suggestion that it arose via an initial inter‐ followed by an intramolecular Michael reaction. The first systematic study of the intramolecular Michael reaction appeared in 1945. Thus, treatment of a variety of substituted ethyl coumarinates with sodium alkoxide in alcohol solvent leads to coumarins. Of particular interest is the fact that the reaction proceeds efficiently even when the β carbon of the acceptor is substituted with two sterically demanding groups. This apparent lack of retardation by double substitution at the β carbon contrasts sharply with the intermolecular Michael reaction and appears to be general. Another example highlighting the susceptibility of sterically hindered systems to participate in intra‐ but not intermolecular Michael reactions comes from studies concerning the mode of activation of the antibiotics calicheamicin and esperamicin. Access to the tetracyclic precursor of a taxol analog was achieved via an intramolecular Michael addition to the relatively hindered β carbon of enone. The intramolecular Michael reaction again formed the subject of publications appearing in 1951, 1957, and 1962. During the 1960s, comparatively little study or use of the reaction was reported. A notable and historically significant exception, however, was Corey's use of it in a total synthesis of longifolene. This approach to the construction of tricyclic systems is similar to that suggested mechanistically in the base‐induced conversion of santonin to santonic acid. The 1970s and 1980s witnessed a dramatic increase in uses of the intramolecular Michael reaction. Much of the chemistry discussed in this chapter focuses upon material discovered during this time period.

show abstract

Breckpot β‐Lactam Synthesis

2010

Comprehensive Organic Name Reactions and Reagents

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Synthesis of 2,2-dimethyl-1-carbapenam derivatives via an intramolecular michael-type reaction

Cited by 11 publications

References 13 publications

Asymmetric Michael Additions to Nitroalkenes

Asymmetric Michael Additions to Nitroalkenes

The IntramolecularMichael Reaction

Breckpot β‐Lactam Synthesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About