approach to enhance the stability of the material under device working condition, i.e., light and thermal stress. [6,7] ABX 3 halide perovskites most commonly used in solar cells contain cesium, methylammonium (MA) and formamidinium (FA) in the A site, Pb in the B, and Br and I in the X site of the crystalline lattice. [1,8-10] Compositions based on organic cations, such as MA and FA, can be prepared with a bandgap of around 1.5 eV, which is suited for an efficient single junction solar cell. [11] However, the presence of organic cations, and in particular the volatile MA, is linked to the relatively poor thermal stability and the high sensitivity to humid air, which affect most of the perovskite compositions employed in highly efficient PSCs. [12-16] Swapping entirely or in part the organic with inorganic cations, such as cesium (Cs), can help to enhance the stability of halide perovskites at the cost of a bandgap higher than 1.5, [17,18] which is suboptimal for a single junction solar cells. For example, the fully inorganic CsPbI 3 perovskite has a bandgap of 1.7 eV, which is not optimal for single junction but is instead nearly ideally suited for perovskite-silicon tandem solar cell. [19-21] Unfortunately, CsPbI 3 is only stable in the photovoltaic active perovskite structure-black phase-at temperatures above 300 °C, [22-25] which is not useful for applications. Partially (or completely) replacing iodide (I) with bromide (Br), i.e., exploring CsPbI x Br (3−x) compositions, can stabilize the active photovoltaic phase at room temperature with progressively increasing bandgap as the bromine content increases. This mixed halide approach is extensively used to prepared stable inorganic halide perovskite both for photo voltaic and light emitting devices. [26-32] As restricted to photovoltaics, it is a challenge controlling the interplay between phase stability, which can be obtained by enhancing the Br content, while maintaining the smallest possible bandgap. Indeed, the larger ionic radius of I as compared to Br upsets the stability perovskite, which tends to relax in a photovoltaic inactive delta phase. [33-37] The I/Br ratio must be therefore adjusted to achieve the lowest possible bandgap without sacrificing the perovskite phase stability. In the search for the best I/Br ratio, CsPbI 2 Br (I 67%, Br 33%) has been so far indicated as the optimum to achieve the highest efficiency PSC with a stable inorganic perovskite. [34-38] Liu et al. reported