“…LiBH 4 Reduction of 21 to Afford Alcohol 22: This was performed using the same procedures described above for the “LiBH 4 reduction of 9 to afford alcohol 10 ” except that 9 was replaced by 21 . Data for 22 (a colorless oil, 263 mg, 1.07 mmol, chromatography using 15:1 PE/EtOAc, 76 % from 21 ): [ α ] D 25 = –2.5 ( c = 1.00, CHCl 3 ) (lit [ α ] D 20 = –2.0 ( c = 1.00, CHCl 3 )). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ = 3.50 (dd, J = 10.6, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.46–3.39 (m, 2H), 3.37 (dd, J = 9.7, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 1.77–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.60 (s, 1H), 1.44 (dt, J = 13.6, 6.9 Hz, 1H), 0.94 (dd, J = 6.7, 0.7 Hz, 3H), 0.92–0.87 (m, 12H), 0.04 (s, 6H) ppm; 13 C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ = 68.41, 68.37, 37.43, 33.44, 33.40, 26.10, 18.50, 17.97, 17.85, –5.23 ppm; FT‐IR (film of a concd solution in CH 2 Cl 2 ) ν = 3444, 2956, 2928, 2857, 1471, 1257, 1196, 1095, 1076, 836, 775 cm –1 ; ESI‐MS m/z 247.2 ([M + H] + ); ESI‐HRMS calcd.…”