2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2012.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, structures and photoluminescent properties of Cu+ complexes with extended π-systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cu–P bond distances are in the range of 2.250(1)–2.260(1) Å, except for Cu(2)–P(3) with a longer distance of 2.280(1) Å, indicating the effect of larger steric hindrance and/or ligand field splitting due to CH 3 CN than water. The Cu–N bond distances between the Cu centers and the MeOpyz ligand (2.070(4)–2.098(4) Å) are similar to those reported for pyrazine-bridged Cu­(I) complexes. , The Cu(2)–N(3) bond distance of 2.032­(5) Å in H 2 O–Cu 2 –AN is also similar to that in the starting material [Cu­(CH 3 CN) 4 ]­(BF 4 ). It is noteworthy that the Cu–O distance in H 2 O–Cu 2 –AN is considerably longer by ∼0.04 Å than that in H 2 O–Cu 2 –H 2 O , although these Cu–O bond distances are short enough to make coordination bonds considering the sum of the ionic radius of Cu­(I) and O 2– ions (2.36 Å).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Cu–P bond distances are in the range of 2.250(1)–2.260(1) Å, except for Cu(2)–P(3) with a longer distance of 2.280(1) Å, indicating the effect of larger steric hindrance and/or ligand field splitting due to CH 3 CN than water. The Cu–N bond distances between the Cu centers and the MeOpyz ligand (2.070(4)–2.098(4) Å) are similar to those reported for pyrazine-bridged Cu­(I) complexes. , The Cu(2)–N(3) bond distance of 2.032­(5) Å in H 2 O–Cu 2 –AN is also similar to that in the starting material [Cu­(CH 3 CN) 4 ]­(BF 4 ). It is noteworthy that the Cu–O distance in H 2 O–Cu 2 –AN is considerably longer by ∼0.04 Å than that in H 2 O–Cu 2 –H 2 O , although these Cu–O bond distances are short enough to make coordination bonds considering the sum of the ionic radius of Cu­(I) and O 2– ions (2.36 Å).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The Cu−P bond distances are in the range of 2.250(1)−2.260(1) Å, except for Cu(2)−P(3) with a longer distance of 2.280(1) Å, indicating the effect of larger steric hindrance and/or ligand field splitting due to CH 3 CN than water. The Cu−N bond distances between the Cu centers and the MeOpyz ligand (2.070(4)−2.098(4) Å) are similar to those reported for pyrazine-bridged Cu(I) complexes 39,52. The Cu(2)−N(3) bond distance of 2.032(5) Å in H 2 O−Cu 2 −AN is also similar to that in the starting material [Cu(CH 3 CN) 4 ]-(BF 4 ).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%