2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2010.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetizing a debt guarantee: Super-replication versus utility approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arping (2010), for instance, analyzed the desirability of fair pricing of government guarantees for bank liabilities. Jacques et al (2011) compared two strategies for replicating a put option implemented to synthetize a debt guarantee contract. The first strategy, superreplication, while keeping the portfolio value bigger or equal to a target value, minimized the transaction expenses of replicating a debt insurance put option by applying dynamic linear programming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arping (2010), for instance, analyzed the desirability of fair pricing of government guarantees for bank liabilities. Jacques et al (2011) compared two strategies for replicating a put option implemented to synthetize a debt guarantee contract. The first strategy, superreplication, while keeping the portfolio value bigger or equal to a target value, minimized the transaction expenses of replicating a debt insurance put option by applying dynamic linear programming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%