System of Systems Engineering

Keating, Charles B.; Rogers, Ralph V.; Unal, Resit; Dryer, David; Sousa‐Poza, Andres; Safford, Robert R.; Peterson, William; Rabadi, Ghaith

doi:10.1080/10429247.2003.11415214

Cited by 338 publications

(152 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

149

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Problem formulation is considered a portal into complex system understanding and is instrumental in the eventual development of solutions that might bring about positive change (Dery, 1984;Lynn, 1980;Warfield, 1976). The differing terminology associated with problem formulation phase include: formulating the mess (Ackoff, 1974(Ackoff, , 1978Majone and Quade, 1980;Mason and Mitroff, 1981;Mitroff and Emshoff, 1979), problem articulation (Wellington, 1887), problem bounding (Checkland, 1993), problem context (Crownover, 2005;Jackson, 1991Jackson, , 2003, problem definition (Dery, 1984;Blanchard and Fabrycky, 2006;Gibson et al, 2007;Warfield, 1976), problem framing (Fairhurst and Sarr, 1996;Keating et al, 2003), problem identification (Majone and Quade, 1980), problem setting (Majone and Quade, 1980;Miser and Quade, 1988) and problem situation (Miser and Quade, 1988). These different terms all reflect different ways in which problem formulation has been described.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emerging systems theory-based pathologies for governance of complex systems

Katina

2015

IJSSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to develop a systems theory-based construct for pathologies within the context of complex system problem formulation. Problem formulation is arguably one of the most critical phases of any endeavour to improve systems. However, there is relatively little research utilising systems theory during problem formulation. A possible extension of the systems research is the introduction of systems theory (i.e., laws, principles and concepts) as a foundation for exploration, innovation, transformation, evaluation and evolution of complex systems. Specifically, this paper is concerned with how we might use systems theory to articulate pathologies -circumstances, conditions, factors, patterns and/or issues acting to impede system performance. The paper examines the importance of problem formulation for issues related to complex systems. A multidisciplinary literature review is then provided to synthesise insights on pathologies. A systems theory-based construct for pathologies is then developed. Finally, the paper provides implications for the systems theory-based pathologies construct related to complex system governance. The paper concludes with possible future research directions.Keywords: complexity; construct; interdependence; management cybernetics; metasystem pathology; problem formulation; system pathology; systems theory; viable system model; VSM.Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Katina, P.F. (2015) 'Emerging systems theory-based pathologies for governance of complex systems', Int.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emerging systems theory-based pathologies for governance of complex systems

Katina

2015

IJSSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite the recent increase in interest in engineering systems of systems [9], there has been little consensus on a successful modelling approach. An object-oriented (OO) approach has been recommended for the specification and analysis of requirements for systems of systems [10,11].…”

Section: Agent Viewpointmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Agent-Based Modelling Approaches to Support the Development of Safety Policy for Systems of Systems

Hall-May

Kelly

2006

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. A safety policy defines the set of rules that governs the safe interaction of agents operating together as part of a system of systems (SoS). Agent autonomy can give rise to unpredictable, and potentially undesirable, emergent behaviour. Deriving rules of safety policy requires an understanding of the capabilities of an agent as well as how its actions affect the environment and consequently the actions of others. Methods for multi-agent system design can aid in this understanding. Such approaches mention organisational rules. However, there is little discussion about how they are derived. This paper proposes modelling systems according to three viewpoints: an agent viewpoint, a causal viewpoint and a domain viewpoint. The agent viewpoint captures system capabilities and inter-relationships. The causal viewpoint describes the effect an agent's actions has on its environment as well as inter-agent influences. The domain viewpoint models assumed properties of the operating environment.

show abstract

“…Context [43] The more complex a R and D organization, the higher the potential to experience "soft" (e.g., political) influences that lie beyond traditional views of structure to capture or address.…”

Section: Systems Concepts and Reference R And D Structural Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systems-Based Framework for Design and Analysis of an R and D Structure

Katina

Keating

Magpili

2017

Systems

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A critical challenge for managerial effectiveness and competitive advantage in research and development (R and D) organizations is developing an appropriate structural configuration. However, in finding an appropriate structural configuration, R and D managers are faced with unprecedented levels of uncertainty, ambiguity, and accelerating complexity, coupled with demands for increased productivity. This paper develops a systems-based framework to support rigorous design, analysis, and transformation of the structure for R and D organizations. The framework development includes: (1) a review of the literature for the nature and role of the structure in R and D management; (2) setting of the R and D structure problem from a systems perspective; (3) establishing a systems view of R and D structure; (4) articulation of a systems-based framework for R and D structure drawing on management cybernetics and systems theory; and (5) an application of the framework to design the structure for a multidisciplinary R and D center. The paper concludes with implications and utility of the framework for practicing R and D managers challenged with structuring an R and D organization.

show abstract

System of Systems Engineering

Cited by 338 publications

References 11 publications

Emerging systems theory-based pathologies for governance of complex systems

Emerging systems theory-based pathologies for governance of complex systems

Using Agent-Based Modelling Approaches to Support the Development of Safety Policy for Systems of Systems

A Systems-Based Framework for Design and Analysis of an R and D Structure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About