2021
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Detection of Large-Scale Multigene Horizontal Transfer in Prokaryotes

Abstract: Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is central to prokaryotic evolution. However, little is known about the “scale” of individual HGT events. In this work, we introduce the first computational framework to help answer the following fundamental question: How often does more than one gene get horizontally transferred in a single HGT event? Our method, called HoMer, uses phylogenetic reconciliation to infer single-gene HGT events across a given set of species/strains, employs several techniques to account for inferenc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the second round of the Ranger-DTL step (as mentioned above in the ‘Data collection and processing’ section), as prior research exemplified, the change in transfer costs from ‘3’ to ‘4’ resulted in the detection of more reliable HGT-related genes, but much fewer in number. Those genes also had higher risks of false negatives ( 40 , 41 ). However, by comparing transfer cost ‘4’ results with cost ‘3’ results during the aggregation step, the chances of false negatives could be reduced ( 41 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the second round of the Ranger-DTL step (as mentioned above in the ‘Data collection and processing’ section), as prior research exemplified, the change in transfer costs from ‘3’ to ‘4’ resulted in the detection of more reliable HGT-related genes, but much fewer in number. Those genes also had higher risks of false negatives ( 40 , 41 ). However, by comparing transfer cost ‘4’ results with cost ‘3’ results during the aggregation step, the chances of false negatives could be reduced ( 41 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those genes also had higher risks of false negatives ( 40 , 41 ). However, by comparing transfer cost ‘4’ results with cost ‘3’ results during the aggregation step, the chances of false negatives could be reduced ( 41 ). This was because the AggregateRanger step aggregated all the Ranger-DTL results (per orthology group) into one result and provided the percentage of genes in each orthology group that showed 100% consistent ‘events’ and ‘mapping’ among all optimally calculated Ranger results ( 23 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-occurrence of genes can be caused by vertical co-inheritance, horizontal co-transfer, co-selection, that is co-occurring selection pressures, or epistasis, that is when the fitness effect of one gene depends on the presence or absence of the other gene. Notably, the relative frequency of multi-gene transfers is higher between species compared to within species ( Kloub et al 2021 ), suggesting an important role for AGT in co-transfer. Thus, gene co-occurrences cannot be simply matched with the importance of selection, contrasting previous conclusions ( McInerney 2022 ).…”
Section: Considering Multiple Accessory Genes and Their Linkage Resul...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers even doubt the meaningfulness of the notion of species in prokaryotes, where genes are commonly exchanged between organisms (Doolittle and Zhaxybayeva, 2009). Indeed, bacterial and archaeal genomes possess a relatively restricted number of specific genes ('core genome'), while many functional genes related to adaptations to the environment are freely transferred horizontally through plasmid exchanges and conjugation (Paquola et al, 2018;Kloub et al, 2021) (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Two Different Diversity Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%