2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and evidence based recommendations on texture modified foods and thickened liquids for adults (above 17 years) with oropharyngeal dysphagia – An updated clinical guideline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
59
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature search identified one guideline giving evidence-based recommendations for the use of texture-modified diets for adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia [128], which was recently updated [129] and considered relevant to the key question. The guideline was developed as recommended by the Danish Centre for Clinical Guidelines.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature search identified one guideline giving evidence-based recommendations for the use of texture-modified diets for adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia [128], which was recently updated [129] and considered relevant to the key question. The guideline was developed as recommended by the Danish Centre for Clinical Guidelines.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a literature analysis, it can be noted that although dietary changes in the consistency of the foods and fluid thickening improve the nutritional state of patients with chronic dysphagia, the reduction of the risk of aspiration pneumonia remains debatable ( 7 , 65 ). Deceptively, expert stakeholders (industries and clinical rheologists) have underlined the need to increase viscosity as the main target of dietetic intervention in dysphagia and suggest that many minced or pureed food could be mixed with xanthan gum or modified maltodextrines amylase resistant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the discussion section of the named paper (1), the authors point out that the results from a recent systematic review on randomized control trials by Beck et al (2) which cautioned against routine use of modified liquids is not supported by the present study results. It is worth to consider whether the results of the study by Martín et al (1) would change the conclusions of the systematic review by Beck et al (2). We believe that it would not.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 91%