2019
DOI: 10.1080/13614568.2019.1677787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and usability evaluation of writing mobile apps for children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobile tools, such as Google Docs and ShiMo Docs, offer comprehensive support for the writing process both inside and outside the classroom, from task discussion and collaborative languaging to text co‐construction, revision, editing, and final co‐written product. Therefore, in recent decades, there has been a growing number of studies on various aspects of MBCW, including investigating where (and how) L2 acquisition happens beyond the formal learning settings (Cho, 2017; Jiang & Zhang, 2020), examining the types of technologies individuals are using (and why) (Hwang & Wu, 2014; Missen et al., 2019), and gaining insights into students' behaviors, experiences, and perspectives concerning the CW process (Aghajani & Adloo, 2018; Zou & Li, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile tools, such as Google Docs and ShiMo Docs, offer comprehensive support for the writing process both inside and outside the classroom, from task discussion and collaborative languaging to text co‐construction, revision, editing, and final co‐written product. Therefore, in recent decades, there has been a growing number of studies on various aspects of MBCW, including investigating where (and how) L2 acquisition happens beyond the formal learning settings (Cho, 2017; Jiang & Zhang, 2020), examining the types of technologies individuals are using (and why) (Hwang & Wu, 2014; Missen et al., 2019), and gaining insights into students' behaviors, experiences, and perspectives concerning the CW process (Aghajani & Adloo, 2018; Zou & Li, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autores Título do artigo Periódico Diante dos estudos identificados, percebe-se uma pluralidade de temáticas relacionadas aos campos principais de interesse deste estudo, a saber, user experience e m-commerce. Os artigos encontrados exploram desde questões relacionadas com experiência do usuário em mobile banking (Peevers et al, 2011;Otair, 2012;Qu, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018;Valaei et al, 2019), passando por tecnologia e novas mídias (Cortimiglia et al, 2011;Shirazi & Iqbal, 2017;Hinarejos et al, 2019;Rachad & Idri, 2020;Yoo, 2020), turismo (Dorcic et al, 2019;Chuang, 2020), fatores críticos de usabilidade e questões técnicas (Zhang et al, 2010;Zahra et al, 2013;Desruelle & Gielen, 2015;Padovani et al, 2017), percepção e satisfação dos consumidores (Bilgihan et al, 2016;Pellet et al, 2018;Zheng & Jin, 2019;Jha & Mahmoud, 2019), grupos específicos (Boateng et al, 2013;Missen et al, 2019) e inclusão (Liu et al, 2010). A presença de tamanha variedade entre os tópicos demonstra que o campo ainda está em amadurecimento, mas também que permite uma multiplicidade de abordagens que vai desde novas tecnologias à comportamento do consumidor e segmentação de mercado.…”
Section: Anounclassified
“…A investigação sobre grupos específicos, como mulheres e crianças, também figurou entre as pesquisas identificadas. Saad Missen et al (2019) desenvolveram uma revisão sistemática dos aplicativos disponíveis no contexto infantil, além de desenvolver e aplicar uma avaliação de usabilidade dos apps analisados. Os autores identificaram que quanto maior o número de funcionalidades de um aplicativo mobile, menor é sua usabilidade.…”
Section: Anounclassified
“…Open‐ended drawing or writing apps can be particularly useful for encouraging children to generate and record their own messages using any form of writing they have (e.g., scribbles, drawing, letter‐like forms), which aligns with early learning standards and developmentally appropriate practices (Gerde et al., 2021). While animated tools can encourage reluctant writers, families should ensure virtual features align with the purpose of the writing task, so they do not divert children's attention from their writing (Missen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Writing With Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers should guide families toward apps such as LetterSchool and WritingWizard that provide writing instruction including demonstrations of writing and practice regarding how to form a letter and labeling the letter's name and sound (Quinn & Bliss, 2019). Like reading apps, helpful writing apps provide children immediate feedback on their work and opportunities to revise (Missen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Writing With Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%