2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review: The oncological safety of adipose fat transfer after breast cancer surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
2
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another concern is the use of cell therapy in areas with previous malignancy, as preclinical data have suggested that cell therapy can aggravate any remaining cancer cells . However, this has so far not been shown in the clinical setting, as we only could identify one case of recurrence following cell‐assisted lipotransfer among 121 breast cancer patients, which is well within what could be expected . It is vital in the setting of previous cancer treatment that safety evaluations are conducted thoroughly with sufficiently long follow‐up times, so these initial uplifting results can be confirmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Another concern is the use of cell therapy in areas with previous malignancy, as preclinical data have suggested that cell therapy can aggravate any remaining cancer cells . However, this has so far not been shown in the clinical setting, as we only could identify one case of recurrence following cell‐assisted lipotransfer among 121 breast cancer patients, which is well within what could be expected . It is vital in the setting of previous cancer treatment that safety evaluations are conducted thoroughly with sufficiently long follow‐up times, so these initial uplifting results can be confirmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0 (IBM statistics for Windows version 22, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], and replacement with the final prosthesis was performed after a mean of 19 weeks (range 17-25). The mean volume of the definitive prosthesis was 438 cc (range 150-800 cc): although there were no statistically significant differences between groups (p > 0.05), larger volume prostheses were used in group 1 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in breast implant augmentation, lipofilling now has a well-recognized role [10,11]. A large number of studies have investigated the technique of fat grafting, its safety in breast surgery, the variations offered by the different types of harvesting techniques, optimal donor site, device employed, elaboration of adipose tissue, recipient site preparation, and timing of surgery [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Many reviews are available comparing dozens of studies, analyzing every step of the lipofilling procedure, in order to find a standard method to ensure the best graft-taking rate [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several metaanalyses and systematic reviews have unanimously concluded that autologous fat transfer does not lead to an increased rate of locoregional breast cancer recurrence. [65][66][67][68][69][70] However, as mentioned previously, a higher rate of biopsies exists with patients who have undergone fat grafting to the breasts compared with the general population, as fat necrosis may be difficult to distinguish radiographically from breast cancer. 21,22 That is, to date there is a substantial amount of evidence that fat grafting remains a safe and highly effective option for cosmetic breast surgery in patients with a history of breast cancer.…”
Section: Oncological Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%