1986
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3975(86)90108-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systèmes codés

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
4

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
103
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We begin by recalling the relationship between shift spaces and languages. We refer the reader to [BH86,LM95] for further background and proofs.…”
Section: Definitions and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We begin by recalling the relationship between shift spaces and languages. We refer the reader to [BH86,LM95] for further background and proofs.…”
Section: Definitions and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generically, then, a β-shift is not sofic and does not possess the specification property [BM86,Sch97]. Every β-shift can be presented by a countable state directed labeled graph Γ β , which is shown in Figure 1 (see also [BH86,PS07,Tho10]). We describe the construction of this graph, assuming that w(β) is not eventually periodic.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The even shift is an example of a sofic system. A subshift Σ is called a coded system if it can be represented by an irreducible countable labeled graph [3]. We do not know if every sofic system, or even if every coded system is an exclusion subshift.…”
Section: Sfts and Sofic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subshift Σ is called a coded system if it is topologically conjugate to the shift on an irreducible countable labeled graph [3]. Equivalently, Σ is called coded if Σ contains an increasing sequence of irreducible subshifts of finite type (SFTs) whose union is dense in Σ [4].…”
Section: Coded Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid ambiguities, we consider the syntactic semigroup of a full shift to be the trivial semigroup. On the other hand, if X is a subshift of A Z different from a full shift then the syntactic semigroup of L(X ) is independent of A, basically because all elements of the non-empty set A + \ L(X ) are in the same class of the syntactic congruence, which is a zero of the syntactic semigroup [8]. For a pseudovariety V, consider the class S (V) of subshifts X whose syntactic semigroup belongs to V. …”
Section: Classes Of Sofic Subshifts Closed Under Taking Divisorsmentioning
confidence: 99%