2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic G-CSF treatment does not improve long-term outcomes after neonatal hypoxic–ischaemic brain injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that G-CSF is effective in treating cardiac damage induced by ischemia reperfusion and cerebral ischemia [33,34]. However, G-CSF does not improve in all tissues or types of injury [35]. While G-CSF may acutely mobilize cells, here we evaluated the ability of G-CSF to mobilize BMDSCs that remain engrafted in the uterus after ischemia/reperfusion injury.…”
Section: Du Naqvi and Taylor Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous studies have shown that G-CSF is effective in treating cardiac damage induced by ischemia reperfusion and cerebral ischemia [33,34]. However, G-CSF does not improve in all tissues or types of injury [35]. While G-CSF may acutely mobilize cells, here we evaluated the ability of G-CSF to mobilize BMDSCs that remain engrafted in the uterus after ischemia/reperfusion injury.…”
Section: Du Naqvi and Taylor Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our EPM finding is in agreement with previous studies that report increased anxiety in neonates (PND 13), young adult or aged rodents following perinatal asphyxia (Hoeger et al, 2000; Morales et al, 2010; Weitzdoerfer et al, 2004). However, no significant changes in anxiety were found in young adult rats that had been exposed to neonatal HI (Arteni et al, 2010; Schlager et al, 2011). Some possible reasons why this discrepancy in findings might be observed include methodological differences between the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some possible reasons why this discrepancy in findings might be observed include methodological differences between the studies. Specifically, in Schlager and colleagues (2011) the index of anxiety being used was the percentage of time spent in the border areas of a different maze, namely the open field (Schlager et al, 2011). Regarding the non-significant change found by Arteni et al (2010), it is possible that the existence of a railing on the open arms of EPM may have interfered with rats' behavior (Arteni et al, 2010).…”
Section: Effects Of Maternal Separation and Neonatal Hypoxia-ischemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We focused on Open-Field test (OF) [21] and tests assessing activity and anxiety, Novel-Object-Recognition test (NOR) [22] assessing memory function. Tests were performed as described previously [23] with some modifications. In short, animals were handled, every other day, during their active phase (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%