2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic risk, macroprudential policy frameworks, monitoring financial systems and the evolution of capital adequacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
70
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, main aspects of the regulatory reforms concentrating in measuring and regulating systemic risk. Arnold analyzed challenge of the monitory financial system, detected of vulnerability which might lead a further financial instability, indicating the way to set the prudential policies (Arnold, 2012). A danger of contagion could cause bank failure, at the same times, the contagious defaults could break down the substantial fraction in the banking system, and imposing higher a cost to society.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, main aspects of the regulatory reforms concentrating in measuring and regulating systemic risk. Arnold analyzed challenge of the monitory financial system, detected of vulnerability which might lead a further financial instability, indicating the way to set the prudential policies (Arnold, 2012). A danger of contagion could cause bank failure, at the same times, the contagious defaults could break down the substantial fraction in the banking system, and imposing higher a cost to society.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Financial Action Task Force encouraged to full implementation for supervisory plan. Many experts suggested that the authorities should estimate the challenges in the implemented result of regulation and supervision reforms (Berger, 2009;Arnold, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penilaian sistem CAMEL ini, mengukur apakah manajemen bank telah melaksanakan sistem perbankan dengan asas-asas yang sehat.Indikator yang dapat mempengaruhi Camel yaitu aspek permodalan (Capital).Penilaian pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif faktor permodalan antara lain dilakukan melalui penilaian terhadap komponen-komponen: kecukupan pemenuhan Kewajiban Penyediaan Modal Minimum (KPMM) terhadap ketentuan yang berlaku, komposisi permodalan, trend ke depan/proyeksi KPMM, aktiva produktif yang diklasifikasikan dibandingkan dengan modal bank, kemampuan bank memelihara kebutuhan penambahan modal yang berasal dari keuntungan (laba ditahan), rencana permodalan bank untuk mendukung pertumbuhan usaha, akses kepada sumber permodalan, serta kinerja keuangan pemegang saham untuk meningkatkan permodalan bank ( Zhang, et al, 2008;Shehzad et al, 2010;Arnold et al, 2012;Shaw et al, 2013).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Simultaneously, many research efforts are devoted to understand the role of banks or, broadly speaking, of financial institutions in the creation and in the consecutive spreading of systemic risk. Given the prominent importance of the topic and its multifaceted nature, the literature on evaluation and anticipation of systemic events is huge (see Demirgüç-Kunt and Detragiache, 1998;Kaminsky and Reinhart, 1999;Harrington, 2009;Scheffer et al, 2009;Barrell et al, 2010;Duttagupta and Cashin, 2011;Kritzman et al, 2011;Allen et al, 2012;Arnold et al, 2012;Bisias et al, 2012;Scheffer et al, 2012;Merton et al, 2013;Oet et al, 2013, among many contributions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%