Tabletop games for photo consumption at theme parks

Anstead, Edward; Durrant, Abigail; Benford, Steve; Kirk, David

doi:10.1145/2396636.2396646

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We were able to identify only few tabletop-related studies that seek to specify the relation between playfulness and other concepts pertaining to user experience, which is in agreement with the remark made by Anstead et al (2012) that studies of tabletop gaming rarely consider how aspects of gameplay and playfulness may be used as interaction mechanisms within other tasks.…”

Section: Playfulnesssupporting

confidence: 80%

“…Iglesias et al ( 2009) present a playful environment for learning intelligent systems, based on programming soccer teams in the Robocup competition. Anstead et al (2012) developed tabletop ''sideshow games'' that allow small groups (families) to sort and triage photos taken in already playful circumstances-a day trip to a UK theme park. Marchetti and Petersson Brooks (2012a) present Micro-Culture, a game about urban development that was designed as a mixed reality tangible installation containing playful elements that aimed at keeping children's attention focused on the learning content and the game.…”

Section: Tabletops As Appliance and Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Playful User Interfaces

Nijholt¹

2014

Gaming Media and Social Effects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.

show abstract

Section: Playfulnesssupporting

confidence: 80%

Section: Tabletops As Appliance and Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Playful User Interfaces

Nijholt¹

2014

Gaming Media and Social Effects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On average, we found 4.8 (SD=2.5), 5.5 (SD=3.5), and 6.6 (SD=2.8) WA information exchanges in the private, task-dependent, and public modes, respectively. We did not find a significant main effect of either feedback mode (F (2,18) of WA information exchanges. However, we did find a significant interaction between factors (F(2,18)=4.489, p<.05), suggesting that the public feedback mode is more sensitive to distractors than private mode (F(2,18)=7.573, p<.05), increasing total information exchanges.…”

Section: Workpace Awareness Information Exchangescontrasting

confidence: 79%

“…In the past decade, interactive tabletops have been successfully used in multiple domains, including healthcare, education, entertainment, and cultural exhibitions [2,18,34,36]. These devices show significant advantages in supporting multi-user interaction, namely due to their large shared surface.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative Tabletops for Blind People

Mendes

Reis

Guerreiro

et al. 2020

Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fig. 1. Blind users collaborating on an interactive tabletop. Left: after receiving spatial audio feedback about her partners' findings, a user drags her finger to that location. Middle: a user found a relevant object for her partner, proceeding to grab and guide his hand to the object's position. Right: without knowing where their partners are exploring, the users experience unintentional physical contact. Interactive tabletops offer unique collaborative features, particularly their size, geometry, orientation and, more importantly, the ability to support multiuser interaction. Although previous efforts were made to make interactive tabletops accessible to blind people, the potential to use them in collaborative activities remains unexplored. In this paper, we present the design and implementation of a multiuser auditory display for interactive tabletops, supporting three feedback modes that vary on how much information about the partners' actions is conveyed. We conducted a user study with ten blind people to assess the effect of feedback modes on workspace awareness and task performance. Furthermore, we analyze the type of awareness information exchanged and the emergent collaboration strategies. Finally, we provide implications for the design of future tabletop collaborative tools for blind users. CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Accessibility; Empirical studies in accessibility; User studies.

show abstract

“…In HCI however, less has been written about how embarrassment is dealt with in respect of user-generated content. Anstead, et al, [2] compare the impact of embarrassing photos between family and friendship groups in a theme park, concluding that the inclusion of embarrassing footage in souvenirs can negatively impact an individual's public image. In this study we observed participants being equally cautious toward footage in which they were invested.…”

Section: Public Private and Avoiding Embarrassmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

MarathOn Multiscreen

Anstead

Benford

Houghton

2016

Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work &Amp; Social Computing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports and discusses the findings of an exploratory study into collaborative user practice with a multiscreen television application. MarathOn Multiscreen allows users to view, share and curate amateur and professional video footage of a community marathon event. Our investigations focused on collaborative sharing practices across different viewing activities and devices, the roles taken by different devices in a viewing ecology, and observations on how users consume professional and amateur content. Our Work uncovers significant differences in user behaviour and collaboration when engaged in more participatory viewing activities, such as sorting and ranking footage, which has implications for awareness of other users' interactions while viewing together and alone. In addition, user appreciation and use of amateur video content is dependent not only on quality and activity but their personal involvement in the contents.

show abstract

Tabletop games for photo consumption at theme parks

Cited by 6 publications

References 33 publications

Playful User Interfaces

Playful User Interfaces

Collaborative Tabletops for Blind People

MarathOn Multiscreen

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About