2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tackling agricultural diffuse pollution: What might uptake of farmer-preferred measures deliver for emissions to water and air?

Abstract: General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms suggesting that costs continue to represent a principal selection criterion for many farmers. 34The 29 measures were mapped onto relevant major farm types and input, assuming 95%

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This study shows that the underlying trend of increasing P losses under climate change (up to 30% by 2050s) is larger than the theoretical reduction recently predicted for maximum uptake of farmer-preferred mitigation options (around 15% for catchment scale 16 ). These findings are also applicable to other agricultural regions in the world with temperate climates where wetter winters are projected.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study shows that the underlying trend of increasing P losses under climate change (up to 30% by 2050s) is larger than the theoretical reduction recently predicted for maximum uptake of farmer-preferred mitigation options (around 15% for catchment scale 16 ). These findings are also applicable to other agricultural regions in the world with temperate climates where wetter winters are projected.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Our integrated, multi-disciplinary study follows these recommendations, with the potential to contribute to the understanding of likely future P losses. We show that the predicted increase in winter P loads due to climate change (up to 30% by 2050s) is greater than the technically feasible reduction from mitigation measures estimated in previous studies 16 . Our study suggests that only large-scale agricultural changes (e.g., 20–80% reduction in P inputs) will limit the projected impacts of climate change on P loads in these catchments.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Therefore, the national reductions achieved by the schemes on around 40% of the total agricultural land area represent an important contribution to the feasible improvement in water quality. The limits on maximum reduction were partly a result of assumed high levels of baseline uptake of many mitigation practices, informed by the Wales farm practice survey, and are comparable with the 10-20% reported for England and Wales (Collins et al 2016).…”
Section: N a T I O N A L S C A L E I M P A C Tsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Therefore, they are critical to informing targeted interventions and improving our understanding of the impact of agricultural management decisions on water quality and the likely ecological 'benefits' associated with the implementation of DPMMs in different environmental settings (Taylor et al, 2013). This paper, reports the hydrochemical monitoring evidence collected over the period 2011-2014 from the UK Government's Demonstration Test Catchments (DTC) programme in the Hampshire Avon and Tamar catchments, in England (McGonigle et al, 2014;Collins et al, 2016), in order to determine sources of diffuse pollution and thereby appropriate DPMMs to implement, to establish the parameters that must be measured in order to capture the key pollutant forms potentially impacting on stream ecology in agricultural catchments, under different environmental settings, we collected data at daily and sub-daily frequency over multiple sites to address four questions:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%