2012
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.1.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailoring Information Provision and Consent Processes to Research Contexts: The Value of Rapid Assessments

Abstract: Guidance requires that consent processes for research be appropriately tailored to their cultural context. This paper discusses the use of rapid assessments to identify cultural and ethical issues arising when explaining research in studies in The Gambia and Ethiopia. The assessments provided insights into appropriate ways of providing information to minimize the risk of stigmatizing vulnerable research populations; research participants’ views about the most important information to provide about research and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When we began this research, we expected low literacy to be one of the factors hindering comprehension at the time of consent to participate in genomic research. However, based on the analysis of our data understanding of the concepts in genomic research dependent more on the methods used to communicate the information [22]. These results were similar to those of a study conducted in Gambia and Bangladesh [10,23,24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…When we began this research, we expected low literacy to be one of the factors hindering comprehension at the time of consent to participate in genomic research. However, based on the analysis of our data understanding of the concepts in genomic research dependent more on the methods used to communicate the information [22]. These results were similar to those of a study conducted in Gambia and Bangladesh [10,23,24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Guidance and regulation on research ethics requires that consent to research must be appropriately informed if it is to be valid [1, 2, 31]. While there is some consensus about core topics that should be covered in all recruitment processes, researchers are required to determine how much information about each of these core topics should be provided, and how to support understanding of the information on a study by study basis [8, 32]. The limited empirical research into developing consent processes for genomic research suggests that promoting participants’ understanding that they are enrolled in genetic or genomic research and the implications of such enrollment can present challenges in a number of African settings [10, 12-15, 17, 18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys were carried out in the study area, during which In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were conducted. These were done using semi-structured interview guides adapted from a rapid assessment method validated in The Gambia [ 22 , 23 ] and Ethiopia [ 5 ]. Three different interview guides were developed for IDIs and used as follows: one for health workers, one for researchers and the last one for community members, community leaders, and non-government organisation (NGO) members.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid ethical assessment is a brief qualitative intervention designed to map the ethical terrain of a research setting prior to recruitment of participants. It has been proposed as one means of improving the consent process in research-naïve settings [ 22 , 23 ]. Rapid ethical assessment was carried out in Ethiopia prior to a genetic study to investigate the genetic basis of podoconiosis [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%