polypropylene (PP)/polyamide 6 (PA6)/layered silicate nanocomposites have a great capacity for combining the advantages of a low‐cost commodity matrix with those of an engineering thermoplastic reinforced with a nanometric filler. Although the morphology and mechanical properties of these systems are well studied, the amount of knowledge available on their crystallization behavior is scarce. This study is focused on how composition, processing procedure, and crystallization method affect the phase structure in both polypropylene and polyamide 6 in the ternary PP/PA6/layered silicate nanocomposites. Several variations of the 2 polymers, their blends, and their composites were studied using differential scanning calorimetry, X‐ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. It was observed that the α/β/γ phase ratio in PP and α/γ ratio in PA6 are strongly affected by the presence of both layered silicate and compatibilizer, as well as the method of solidification. In addition, PA6 was observed to be a more effective nucleating agent for PP, compared with layered silicate.