2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taiwanese aborigines: genetic heterogeneity and paternal contribution to Oceania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Today the aborigines of the island of Taiwan speak 9-12 languages that belong to the Formosan subdivision of Austronesian [9,10] while the inhabitant of Orchid Island, the Yami, speak Yami a member of the Batanic group of languages and itself a member of the Malayo-Polynesian branch of Austronesian that includes all Austronesian languages outside Taiwan. Batanic languages are also spoken in northern Philippines [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today the aborigines of the island of Taiwan speak 9-12 languages that belong to the Formosan subdivision of Austronesian [9,10] while the inhabitant of Orchid Island, the Yami, speak Yami a member of the Batanic group of languages and itself a member of the Malayo-Polynesian branch of Austronesian that includes all Austronesian languages outside Taiwan. Batanic languages are also spoken in northern Philippines [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rst is one of the most widely used measures for genetic differentiation; it plays a central role in ecological and evolutionary genetic studies. Using AMOVA, population Rst and their respective p-values (p<0.05) were calculated in order to understand the genetic relationship between the studied population and other eighteen populations characterized in the literature: China [Han]; Uttar Pradesh, India [Afridi Pathan]; Punjab, India [Balmiki]; Gujarat, India [Bhil]; Andhra Pradesh, India [Brahmin]; Karnataka, India [Indian]; Madhya Pradesh, India [Gond]; Jharkhand, India [Indian]; Madhya Pradesh, India [Indian]; Tamil Nadu, India [Iyengar]; Madhya Pradesh, India [Kanyakubja Brahmin]; Maharashtra, India [Konkanastha Brahmin]; Tripura, India [Riang]; Tripura, India [Tripuri]; Malaysia [Indian]; Nepal [Newar]; Balochistan, Pakistan [Baloch]; and Singapore [Indian] [ 2 , 12 , 22 28 ]. For the comparison, the same 17 Y-STR loci were used ( Table 2 ) with the statistical significance determined by a permutation test with 10,000 replicates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the two analyses was because of the increased number of markers in the analyzed population and the reduced number of markers in the populations that were available for comparison. The first group of populations selected for comparison with the population of Croatia using the Yfiler™ Plus marker set included: Croatia (n = 507, present study), Slovenia (n = 194, (22)), Belgium (n = 160, (23-26)), Hungary (n = 218, (27-33)), Austria (n =392, (34-38)), Germany (n = 495, (39-49)), Italy (n = 689, (50-67)), North Macedonia (n = 295, (68-71)), Serbia (n = 183, (72-74)), Denmark (n=177, (75)), Ethiopia (n=290, (76)), French Polynesia (n=81), (77, 78)), Ghana (n=584, (79)), India (n=541, (80-98)), Lithuania (n=251, (99-101)), Mexico (n=354, (102-107)), Nigeria (n=337, (108)), Pakistan (n=280, (109-121)), Poland (n=612, (122-130)), Russian Federation (n=958, (131-143)), Saudi Arabia (n=156, (144, 145)), Spain (n=316, (146-164)), Switzerland (n=724, (19, 165, 166)), and United Kingdom (n=115, (167, 168)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%