“…This begs the question of how cultural criminological scholarship can challenge such stereotypical depictions of subcultures and the injustice(s) that these bring by rethinking and reintroducing musical subcultures like grime as instruments and conductors of active public participation through sonic, lyrical and bodily performance. Despite recent scholarly optimism (Dimou and Ilan, 2018), ambivalence (Ilan, 2014), healthy scepticism (Bennett and Harris, 2004;Blackman, 2005Blackman, , 2014Huq, 2006;Jencks, 2005;Muggleton and Weinzierl, 2003) and outright pessimism (Lash, 2007;Winlow et al, 2015) about the meaning and value of subcultures and their relation to 'depoliticized play in the post-modern pleasuredome' (Muggleton, 2000: 49), the remainder of this article will (re)present grime as a valuable form of creativity, public expression and political agency -one that continues to resist, criticize and expose its criminalization by 'speaking truth to power' (Benda, 1928;Jacoby, 1987;Said, 1994) and finding innovative ways to carve out a space for public engagement, belonging and even work 'within a music industry that is otherwise dominated by socially-privileged groups' (White, 2018: 1;White, 2016).…”