Talking with parents of children with learning disabilities: Parents’ ideas about the Circle of Security parenting programme

Abstract

Accessible Summary The Circle of Security Parenting (COS‐P) programme can be helpful for some parents of children with learning disabilities to think about their relationship with their child. Parenting a child with learning disabilities is different, and COS‐P can highlight this difference. This can feel painful for parents and may stop them engaging with the programme. Abstract BackgroundBackground: The promotion of secure attachment relationships in childhood leads to better outcomes in later life (British Psychological Society 2017, Incorporating Attachment Theory into Practice: Clinical Practice Guideline for Clinical Psychologists Working with People who have Intellectual Disabilities). The Circle of Security Parenting Programme (COS‐P) provides a clear framework for reflecting on attachment relationships (Cooper et al 2009, Zero to Three, 37, 27). MethodsMethods: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with parents of children with learning disabilities who attended a COS‐P programme to find out about their experiences of the course and how applicable it was to them. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. FindingsFindings: Four key themes were identified: these related to (1) COS‐P concepts are relevant to all children but (2) parenting a child with a learning disability is different and (3) COS‐P can create a focus on their child as different, which can be painful, and (4) changes recommended to make COS‐P suitable for parents of children with learning disabilities. ConclusionsConclusions: This paper outlines the benefits and challenges of COS‐P in sharing concepts related to attachment, whilst highlighting differences for parents of children and young people with learning disabilities, which can be painful.

The Digital Educational Environment: The Problem of Its Accessibility for Visually Impaired Students

“…It is significant that among the blind and visually impaired (age [16][17][18], more than half consider themselves to be computer users. Everyone without exception is planning to use a computer in the future.…”

“…The general problems of integration of people with disabilities into society are considered in the works of different social scientists and psychologists [1], [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], [16][17][18], [20][21][22][23][24], [29]. Much attention is paid to problems generated not by specific restrictions on life, but by special socio-cultural status of the disabled.…”

A reflective evaluation of a feeding clinic intervention—Parents as a reflecting team

“…A qualitative methodology was employed to explore parents' experiences of participating in a feeding clinic. Using interview methods to gain an understanding of service users' experience of group interventions has been noted in the learning disability literature (Dixon‐Ibarra et al, 2018; Muddle et al, 2020). The interviews were designed to promote open discussion and reflections on their experiences (Ogden, 2007).…”

Online Learning: Engaging Families Using Culturally Relevant Pedagogy

“…In addition to dialogue with educators, parents also benefit from spending time interacting with other parents (Muddle et al, 2022). In the remote learning environment, educators can encourage ties between families of students in remote schools through asynchronous discussion boards (Valcarlos et al, 2020).…”

“…Some families may benefit from synchronous options for interaction in addition to or instead of asynchronous discussions. Muddle et al (2022) found that parents of children with LD benefited from group discussion in a program designed to build secure attachment to their children. Teachers can create their own topics for monthly discussion based on the expressed needs of their families.…”