2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.03.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target guided isolation of potential tyrosinase inhibitors from Otholobium pubescens (Poir.) J.W. Grimes by ultrafiltration, high-speed countercurrent chromatography and preparative HPLC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of the polarity gradient solvent systems mainly depended on the suitable partition coefficients ( K value) and settling times the solvent systems offered. The K values were calculated as previously described [ 59 ]. Each solvent system was paired with equal volumes of solvent methanol/water (1:5, v / v ) and individual n -hexane/ethyl acetate (3:5, v / v ), n -hexane/ethyl acetate (2:5, v / v ), n -hexane/ethyl acetate (1:5, v / v ), ethyl acetate, and ethyl acetate/ n -butanol (4:1, v / v ) was partitioned to the upper layer and lower layer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of the polarity gradient solvent systems mainly depended on the suitable partition coefficients ( K value) and settling times the solvent systems offered. The K values were calculated as previously described [ 59 ]. Each solvent system was paired with equal volumes of solvent methanol/water (1:5, v / v ) and individual n -hexane/ethyl acetate (3:5, v / v ), n -hexane/ethyl acetate (2:5, v / v ), n -hexane/ethyl acetate (1:5, v / v ), ethyl acetate, and ethyl acetate/ n -butanol (4:1, v / v ) was partitioned to the upper layer and lower layer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solvent system was screened via HPLC and evaluated according to the partition coefficient ( K value) of the target compounds on the principle introduced by Ito [ 32 ]. Briefly, four solvent systems comprising EtOAc, n -BuOH, and H 2 O were first acidified by using formic acid to 208 mM or basified by using ammonia solution to 29 mM, and then the corresponding K values of the target compounds under acidic ( K acid ) or basic ( K base ) conditions were determined, as previously described [ 36 ]: each acidified or basified solvent system was partitioned to upper layer and lower layer. Thereafter, the extract (about 1–2 mg) was prepared in a 1.5 mL tube and dissolved by adding equal volumes (each 500 µL) of the upper layer and lower layers, which were mixed by a vortex mixer and centrifuged for about 20 s using a C1301 Mini Centrifuge (Labnet International, South Korea).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the antioxidants and enzyme inhibitors in extracts can be screened using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical reaction-based DPPH-high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [ 27 , 28 ] and enzyme–ligand binding affinity-based ultrafiltration-HPLC [ 29 , 30 , 31 ], respectively. Moreover, as a versatile separation chromatography based on a continuous liquid–liquid partition, high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC) with advantages of support matrix-free, no irreversible adsorption, low risk of sample denaturation, and high sample loading capacity has immense potential in separating natural products [ 32 , 33 ], and it is suitable to couple offline DPPH- and ultrafiltration-HPLC in order to achieve efficient screening and separation of bioactive compounds from natural product extracts [ 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Furthermore, pH-zone-refining counter-current chromatography (CCC), developed from conventional HSCCC, can be particularly used for the preparative separation of ionizable target compounds [ 32 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Countercurrent chromatography is a type of liquid–liquid partition chromatography that has been widely used for the separation of components of natural plants [29], preparation of reference standards, and discovery of new compounds [30]. The pH‐peak‐focusing countercurrent chromatography technique was developed from an accidental finding that a thyroxine analog produced an unusually sharp elution peak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%