2004
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0404930101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation induces bystander responses

Abstract: The observation of radiation-induced bystander responses, in which cells respond to their neighbors being irradiated, has important implications for understanding mechanisms of radiation action particularly after low-dose exposure. Much of this questions the current dogma of direct DNA damage driving response in irradiated systems. In this study, we have used a charged-particle microbeam to target individual helium ions ( 3 He 2؉ ) to individual cells within a population of radioresistant glioma cells cultured… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
172
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
9
172
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NO-mediated signalling is probably not involved in early stages of bystander signalling causing DNA damage in NHA and T98G cells as inhibition of NO synthesis by aminoguanidine could not prevent bystander gH2AX foci formation (results not shown). Our previous studies have shown that in bystander T98G cells, micronuclei are produced (Shao et al, 2004), which are presumably a consequence of the induction of damage highlighted by the gH2AX signals reported here. These are NO dependent, suggesting that ROS interact with RNS at later times leading to longer term chromosomal damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…NO-mediated signalling is probably not involved in early stages of bystander signalling causing DNA damage in NHA and T98G cells as inhibition of NO synthesis by aminoguanidine could not prevent bystander gH2AX foci formation (results not shown). Our previous studies have shown that in bystander T98G cells, micronuclei are produced (Shao et al, 2004), which are presumably a consequence of the induction of damage highlighted by the gH2AX signals reported here. These are NO dependent, suggesting that ROS interact with RNS at later times leading to longer term chromosomal damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Bystander effects induced by ionizing irradiation have been studied by various approaches including transfer of conditioned medium from irradiated cells (Lyng et al, 2002;Maguire et al, 2005), low particle fluence irradiation, where only a few percent of cells are irradiated (Azzam et al, 1998), and targeted irradiation of single cells and subcellular structures (Shao et al, 2004;Shao et al, 2003bShao et al, , 2005. They have been shown to occur in both tumour and normal cell types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assay's sensitivity and its demonstrated applicability to CT examinations allow the investigation of normal people without clinical symptoms who are exposed to well defined radiation doses. Thus, the assay has the potential to shed light on the in vivo significance of some radiobiological phenomena that have hitherto been restricted to in vitro measurements, such as the bystander effect (25) or low-dose hypersensitivity (26,27). Moreover, the assessment of ␥-H2AX foci can serve as a biologically relevant biomarker for exposure to low levels of IR.…”
Section: Discussion An Approach To Measure Dsb Induction and Repair Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release of NO from irradiated cells, measured to be in the micromolar level to the medium, induced an increase in radioresistance among the non-irradiated cells which were co-cultured with the irradiated ones (Matsumoto et al, 2001). Shao et al (2003aShao et al ( , 2004 presented evidence for a significant increase in the incidence of micronuclei in the non-irradiated bystander cells that were in the vicinity of ones irradiated through either the nuclei or the cytoplasm with a microbeam facility. Furthermore, 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (c-PTIO) (a scavenger of NO ) abolished excess micronuclei formation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%