2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1488081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax Competition and Income Sorting: Evidence from the Zurich Metropolitan Area

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these studies analyse the valuation of housing characteristics and local taxes in a standard hedonic regression framework, neglecting the endogeneity bias, resulting from unobservable location characteristics. Clustering of wealthy households in localities with more desirable characteristics is certainly relevant in Switzerland (Feld and Kirchg€ assner, 2001;Schmidheiny, 2006;Schaltegger et al, 2011). Moreover, the spatial income distribution and the level of local taxes are determined simultaneously because a larger tax base allows for lower tax rates.…”
Section: Local Taxes and The Costs Of Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of these studies analyse the valuation of housing characteristics and local taxes in a standard hedonic regression framework, neglecting the endogeneity bias, resulting from unobservable location characteristics. Clustering of wealthy households in localities with more desirable characteristics is certainly relevant in Switzerland (Feld and Kirchg€ assner, 2001;Schmidheiny, 2006;Schaltegger et al, 2011). Moreover, the spatial income distribution and the level of local taxes are determined simultaneously because a larger tax base allows for lower tax rates.…”
Section: Local Taxes and The Costs Of Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, distance to the central business district matters because different types of households value commuting costs differently. Clustering of wealthy households in localities with more desirable characteristics is certainly relevant in Switzerland (Feld and Kirchg€ assner, 2001;Schmidheiny, 2006;Schaltegger et al, 2011). Similarly, fixed migration costs imply that high-income individuals are more responsive to tax differences and locate in the low-tax jurisdiction which further drives up rents.…”
Section: Local Taxes and The Costs Of Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… There have also been some important recent papers on this theme, for example, Schaltegger et al. (). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%