1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf00769027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomy of the marine, luminous bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
219
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
219
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such levels provide no indication of a close relationship, and it has been suggested that these two species may deserve a separate generic designation (5,32,33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such levels provide no indication of a close relationship, and it has been suggested that these two species may deserve a separate generic designation (5,32,33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…included. The ability of strains to bioluminesce was examined visually by using 24-and 48-h cultures grown on LM (32). The possibility of low-level bioluminescence was tested by examining LM broth cultures through one entire growth cycle, using a photometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NLSs mediate active transport into the nucleus through nuclear pore complexes [3-61. Nuclear pore complexes are large, grommet-like structures (-120 nm in diameter, molecular mass -124 MDa) [7] which traverse the outer and the inner membranes of the nuclear envelope forming a water-filled channel. The import of proteins into the nucleus consists of at least two steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous taxonomic studies have shown that these four species are closely related to each other, but there is disagreement about the genus into which these species should be classified (Thyssen & Ollevier, 2005). Some analyses of V. fischeri, for example, have identified phenotypic traits (Reichelt & Baumann, 1973) (Baumann & Baumann, 1977) consistent with membership in Photobacterium, whereas other studies have placed V. fischeri in Vibrio based on other phenotypic traits (Hendrie et al, 1970) or on polyphasic analysis of phenotypic and molecular characteristics . Recently, Thompson et al (2005) suggested that the Vibrionaceae should be divided into four families, with the placement of V. fischeri, V. logei and V. wodanis in an unnamed monophyletic group, sister to the Vibrionaceae (which the authors suggest should consist only of genus Vibrio) and separate from the family 'Photobacteriaceae'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%