1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00916317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers' ratings of disruptive behaviors: The influence of halo effects

Abstract: This study evaluated the accuracy of teachers' ratings and examined whether these ratings are influenced by halo effects. One hundred thirty-nine elementary school teachers viewed videotapes of what they believed were children in regular fourth-grade classrooms. In fact, the children were actors who followed prepared scripts that depicted a child engaging in behaviors characteristic of an attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), an oppositional defiant disorder or a normal youngster. The findings provi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
137
1
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
15
137
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple teacher variables, such as flexibility of teacher expectations (Lloyd, Kauffman, Landrum, & Roe, 1991), knowledge of ADHD (Greene, 1996), interpretation of behavior and tolerance for misbehavior (Whalen, 1989), and behavior management practices (Good & Brophy, 1991) may lead to variability in ratings of students. Furthermore, negative halo effects may cause spuriously high ADHD ratings in oppositional children (Abikoff, Courtney, Pelham, & Koplewicz, 1993), and unrealistic expectations regarding Ritalin efficacy for adolescents may bias treatment decisions (Smith, Pelham, Gnagy, & Bukstein, 1998). Finally, student aptitude and preference for one subject over another, as well as classroom size and time of day, may further impact expression of adolescent behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple teacher variables, such as flexibility of teacher expectations (Lloyd, Kauffman, Landrum, & Roe, 1991), knowledge of ADHD (Greene, 1996), interpretation of behavior and tolerance for misbehavior (Whalen, 1989), and behavior management practices (Good & Brophy, 1991) may lead to variability in ratings of students. Furthermore, negative halo effects may cause spuriously high ADHD ratings in oppositional children (Abikoff, Courtney, Pelham, & Koplewicz, 1993), and unrealistic expectations regarding Ritalin efficacy for adolescents may bias treatment decisions (Smith, Pelham, Gnagy, & Bukstein, 1998). Finally, student aptitude and preference for one subject over another, as well as classroom size and time of day, may further impact expression of adolescent behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esto po-dría explicarse porque, al ser las derivaciones realizadas por los profesores, ellos estarían mucho más atentos a la presencia de conductas externalizantes y disruptivas que afectan el funcionamiento habitual y la organización escolar, por lo que pueden no detectar fácil-mente cuadros emocionales que no interfieren visiblemente en la conducta o rendimiento de los niños, lo que está descrito ampliamente en la literatura 23 . Este fenómeno es también es frecuentemente observado en la práctica clíni-ca, donde las derivaciones escolares suelen ser principalmente por conductas disruptivas (24,25) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Abikoff 26 melaporkan bahwa anak yang mengalami hiperaktif-impulsif juga memiliki conduct problem. Hal tersebut serupa dengan penelitian Babinski dan Lambert 25 yang melaporkan bahwa gejala hiperaktif-impulsif dan conduct problem berhubungan erat dan berisiko terhadap perilaku menyimpang pada usia dewasa.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified